From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cong Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] netpoll: use GFP_ATOMIC in slave_enable_netpoll() and __netpoll_setup() Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 20:31:46 +0800 Message-ID: <1344256306.14728.29.camel@cr0> References: <1343403484-29347-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> <1343403484-29347-2-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> <1343985428.9299.868.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1343986487.20871.2.camel@cr0> <1343988623.9299.932.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1344244118.14728.28.camel@cr0> <1344246244.26674.0.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Jay Vosburgh , Andy Gospodarek , Eric Dumazet , Cong Wang , Joe Perches , Neil Horman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1344246244.26674.0.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 11:44 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 17:08 +0800, Cong Wang wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 12:10 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > > > > > I did this , just take it ;) > > > > Do we have to pass gfp to ->ndo_netpoll_setup() too? It seems no, so far > > I don't think we have to do that. > > > > Thanks. > > > > It is needed. > > ->ndo_netpoll_setup() is called from __netpoll_setup() > > So it would make no sense to allow GFP_KERNEL allocations in > ndo_netpoll_setup() hgandlers if we called __netpoll_setup() with > GFP_ATOMIC gfp > I see your point. Thanks!