From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 6/8] netpoll: take rcu_read_lock_bh() in netpoll_send_skb_on_dev()
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 22:23:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1344263012-4031-7-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1344263012-4031-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com>
This patch fixes several problems in the call path of
netpoll_send_skb_on_dev():
1. We already disable IRQ's before calling netpoll_send_skb_on_dev(),
so we don't need to disable IRQ's again.
2. All the callees of netpoll_send_skb_on_dev() should use
rcu_dereference_bh() to dereference ->npinfo.
3. Rename arp_reply() to netpoll_arp_reply(), the former is too generic.
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
---
net/core/netpoll.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++--------------
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/netpoll.c b/net/core/netpoll.c
index d055bb0..174346a 100644
--- a/net/core/netpoll.c
+++ b/net/core/netpoll.c
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static atomic_t trapped;
MAX_UDP_CHUNK)
static void zap_completion_queue(void);
-static void arp_reply(struct sk_buff *skb);
+static void netpoll_arp_reply(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netpoll_info *npinfo);
static unsigned int carrier_timeout = 4;
module_param(carrier_timeout, uint, 0644);
@@ -170,7 +170,8 @@ static void poll_napi(struct net_device *dev)
list_for_each_entry(napi, &dev->napi_list, dev_list) {
if (napi->poll_owner != smp_processor_id() &&
spin_trylock(&napi->poll_lock)) {
- budget = poll_one_napi(dev->npinfo, napi, budget);
+ budget = poll_one_napi(rcu_dereference_bh(dev->npinfo),
+ napi, budget);
spin_unlock(&napi->poll_lock);
if (!budget)
@@ -185,13 +186,14 @@ static void service_arp_queue(struct netpoll_info *npi)
struct sk_buff *skb;
while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&npi->arp_tx)))
- arp_reply(skb);
+ netpoll_arp_reply(skb, npi);
}
}
static void netpoll_poll_dev(struct net_device *dev)
{
const struct net_device_ops *ops;
+ struct netpoll_info *ni = rcu_dereference_bh(dev->npinfo);
if (!dev || !netif_running(dev))
return;
@@ -206,17 +208,18 @@ static void netpoll_poll_dev(struct net_device *dev)
poll_napi(dev);
if (dev->flags & IFF_SLAVE) {
- if (dev->npinfo) {
+ if (ni) {
struct net_device *bond_dev = dev->master;
struct sk_buff *skb;
- while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&dev->npinfo->arp_tx))) {
+ struct netpoll_info *bond_ni = rcu_dereference_bh(bond_dev->npinfo);
+ while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&ni->arp_tx))) {
skb->dev = bond_dev;
- skb_queue_tail(&bond_dev->npinfo->arp_tx, skb);
+ skb_queue_tail(&bond_ni->arp_tx, skb);
}
}
}
- service_arp_queue(dev->npinfo);
+ service_arp_queue(ni);
zap_completion_queue();
}
@@ -302,6 +305,7 @@ static int netpoll_owner_active(struct net_device *dev)
return 0;
}
+/* call with IRQ disabled */
void netpoll_send_skb_on_dev(struct netpoll *np, struct sk_buff *skb,
struct net_device *dev)
{
@@ -309,8 +313,11 @@ void netpoll_send_skb_on_dev(struct netpoll *np, struct sk_buff *skb,
unsigned long tries;
const struct net_device_ops *ops = dev->netdev_ops;
/* It is up to the caller to keep npinfo alive. */
- struct netpoll_info *npinfo = np->dev->npinfo;
+ struct netpoll_info *npinfo;
+
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled());
+ npinfo = rcu_dereference_bh(np->dev->npinfo);
if (!npinfo || !netif_running(dev) || !netif_device_present(dev)) {
__kfree_skb(skb);
return;
@@ -319,11 +326,9 @@ void netpoll_send_skb_on_dev(struct netpoll *np, struct sk_buff *skb,
/* don't get messages out of order, and no recursion */
if (skb_queue_len(&npinfo->txq) == 0 && !netpoll_owner_active(dev)) {
struct netdev_queue *txq;
- unsigned long flags;
txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(dev, skb_get_queue_mapping(skb));
- local_irq_save(flags);
/* try until next clock tick */
for (tries = jiffies_to_usecs(1)/USEC_PER_POLL;
tries > 0; --tries) {
@@ -347,10 +352,9 @@ void netpoll_send_skb_on_dev(struct netpoll *np, struct sk_buff *skb,
}
WARN_ONCE(!irqs_disabled(),
- "netpoll_send_skb(): %s enabled interrupts in poll (%pF)\n",
+ "netpoll_send_skb_on_dev(): %s enabled interrupts in poll (%pF)\n",
dev->name, ops->ndo_start_xmit);
- local_irq_restore(flags);
}
if (status != NETDEV_TX_OK) {
@@ -423,9 +427,8 @@ void netpoll_send_udp(struct netpoll *np, const char *msg, int len)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netpoll_send_udp);
-static void arp_reply(struct sk_buff *skb)
+static void netpoll_arp_reply(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netpoll_info *npinfo)
{
- struct netpoll_info *npinfo = skb->dev->npinfo;
struct arphdr *arp;
unsigned char *arp_ptr;
int size, type = ARPOP_REPLY, ptype = ETH_P_ARP;
--
1.7.7.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-06 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-06 14:23 [PATCH v2 0/8] some netpoll and netconsole fixes Cong Wang
2012-08-06 14:23 ` [PATCH 1/8] netpoll: use GFP_ATOMIC in slave_enable_netpoll() and __netpoll_setup() Cong Wang
2012-08-06 15:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-07 2:28 ` Cong Wang
2012-08-06 14:23 ` [PATCH 2/8] netpoll: make __netpoll_cleanup non-block Cong Wang
2012-08-06 14:23 ` [PATCH 3/8] netconsole: do not release spin_lock when calling __netpoll_cleanup Cong Wang
2012-08-06 14:23 ` [PATCH 4/8] netpoll: take rcu_read_lock_bh() in netpoll_rx() Cong Wang
2012-08-06 14:23 ` [PATCH 5/8] netpoll: use netpoll_rx_on() " Cong Wang
2012-08-06 14:23 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2012-08-06 14:23 ` [PATCH 7/8] bridge: add some comments for NETDEV_RELEASE Cong Wang
2012-08-06 20:50 ` David Miller
2012-08-06 23:39 ` Joe Perches
2012-08-10 10:59 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-08-10 11:13 ` Joe Perches
2012-08-07 2:27 ` Cong Wang
2012-08-07 5:59 ` [Resend PATCH " Cong Wang
2012-08-07 7:10 ` David Miller
2012-08-07 15:13 ` Cong Wang
2012-08-06 14:23 ` [PATCH 8/8] bridge: use list_for_each_entry() in netpoll functions Cong Wang
2012-08-11 18:07 ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-08-07 6:58 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] some netpoll and netconsole fixes Cong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1344263012-4031-7-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com \
--to=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).