From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv4: tcp: security_sk_alloc() needed for unicast_sock
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 17:36:48 +0200
Message-ID: <1344526608.28967.1092.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
References: <50215A7E.8000701@linaro.org> <1695034.0lrQgQPOMT@sifl>
	 <1344523833.28967.996.camel@edumazet-glaptop>  <5799181.tjlnF0gIh2@sifl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>,
	John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>,
	selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, john.johansen@canonical.com,
	LSM <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
To: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <5799181.tjlnF0gIh2@sifl>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 11:07 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:

> Is is possible to do the call to security_sk_alloc() in the ip_init() function 
> or does the per-cpu nature of the socket make this a pain?
> 

Its a pain, if we want NUMA affinity.

Here, each cpu should get memory from its closest node.