netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] netpoll: check netpoll tx status on the right device
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:52:36 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1344585156.29601.4.camel@cr0> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120810072018.GA1543@minipsycho>

On Fri, 2012-08-10 at 09:20 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> > 
> >+static inline int team_dev_queue_xmit(struct team *team, struct team_port *port,
> >+				      struct sk_buff *skb)
> >+{
> >+	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(skb->queue_mapping) !=
> >+		     sizeof(qdisc_skb_cb(skb)->slave_dev_queue_mapping));
> >+	skb_set_queue_mapping(skb, qdisc_skb_cb(skb)->slave_dev_queue_mapping);
> >+
> >+	skb->dev = port->dev;
> >+	if (unlikely(netpoll_tx_running(team->dev))) {
> >+		team_netpoll_send_skb(port, skb);
> >+		return 0;
> >+	}
> >+	return dev_queue_xmit(skb);
> >+}
> >+
> 
> Is there any particular reason for moving the whole function?

In the changelog I mentioned:

"For team_dev_queue_xmit() we have to move it down to avoid
compile errors."

Or you mean this isn't clear? As I changed 'port->dev' to 'team->dev',
so the definition of 'struct team' has to be visual to
team_dev_queue_xmit(), therefore I moved to down after that definition.

Thanks!

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-10  7:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-10  7:10 [PATCH v4 00/14] some netpoll and netconsole fixes Cong Wang
2012-08-10  7:10 ` [PATCH 01/14] netpoll: use GFP_ATOMIC in slave_enable_netpoll() and __netpoll_setup() Cong Wang
2012-08-10  7:10 ` [PATCH 02/14] netpoll: make __netpoll_cleanup non-block Cong Wang
2012-08-10  7:10 ` [PATCH 03/14] netconsole: do not release spin_lock when calling __netpoll_cleanup Cong Wang
2012-08-10  7:10 ` [PATCH 04/14] netpoll: take rcu_read_lock_bh() in netpoll_rx() Cong Wang
2012-08-10  7:10 ` [PATCH 05/14] netpoll: use netpoll_rx_on() " Cong Wang
2012-08-10  7:10 ` [PATCH 06/14] netpoll: take rcu_read_lock_bh() in netpoll_send_skb_on_dev() Cong Wang
2012-08-10  7:10 ` [PATCH 07/14] bridge: add some comments for NETDEV_RELEASE Cong Wang
2012-08-10  7:10 ` [PATCH 08/14] bridge: use list_for_each_entry() in netpoll functions Cong Wang
2012-08-10  7:10 ` [PATCH 09/14] netpoll: check netpoll tx status on the right device Cong Wang
2012-08-10  7:20   ` Jiri Pirko
2012-08-10  7:52     ` Cong Wang [this message]
2012-08-10  8:32       ` Jiri Pirko
2012-08-10  7:10 ` [PATCH 10/14] netpoll: convert several functions to bool Cong Wang
2012-08-10  7:10 ` [PATCH 11/14] vlan: clean up vlan_dev_hard_start_xmit() Cong Wang
2012-08-10  7:14   ` Patrick McHardy
2012-08-10  7:47     ` Cong Wang
2012-08-10  7:10 ` [PATCH 12/14] netpoll: handle vlan tags in netpoll tx and rx path Cong Wang
2012-08-10  7:10 ` [PATCH 13/14] netpoll: re-enable irq in poll_napi() Cong Wang
2012-08-10  7:10 ` [PATCH 14/14] netconsole.txt: revision of examples for the receiver of kernel messages Cong Wang
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-08-09 15:00 [PATCH v3 0/14] some netpoll and netconsole fixes Cong Wang
2012-08-09 15:00 ` [PATCH 09/14] netpoll: check netpoll tx status on the right device Cong Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1344585156.29601.4.camel@cr0 \
    --to=amwang@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=jpirko@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).