From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>,
"Banerjee, Debabrata" <dbanerje@akamai.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ipv6: do not hold route table lock when send ndisc probe
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:11:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1345187499-16929-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> (raw)
In rt6_probe(), we call ndisc_send_ns() with root->rwlock,
but this is not necessary, so we can drop it before calling
ndisc_send_ns().
This could probably fix the deadlock reported by Debabrata:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/16/432
Reported-by: "Banerjee, Debabrata" <dbanerje@akamai.com>
Cc: "Banerjee, Debabrata" <dbanerje@akamai.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
---
net/ipv6/route.c | 7 ++++++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
index 0ddf2d1..7a36df2 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
@@ -460,13 +460,18 @@ static void rt6_probe(struct rt6_info *rt)
time_after(jiffies, neigh->updated + rt->rt6i_idev->cnf.rtr_probe_interval)) {
struct in6_addr mcaddr;
struct in6_addr *target;
+ struct net_device *dev = rt->dst.dev;
+ struct fib6_table *table = rt->rt6i_table;
neigh->updated = jiffies;
read_unlock_bh(&neigh->lock);
+ read_unlock_bh(&table->tb6_lock);
target = (struct in6_addr *)&neigh->primary_key;
addrconf_addr_solict_mult(target, &mcaddr);
- ndisc_send_ns(rt->dst.dev, NULL, target, &mcaddr, NULL);
+ ndisc_send_ns(dev, NULL, target, &mcaddr, NULL);
+
+ read_lock_bh(&table->tb6_lock);
} else {
read_unlock_bh(&neigh->lock);
}
--
1.7.7.6
next reply other threads:[~2012-08-17 7:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-17 7:11 Cong Wang [this message]
2012-08-17 7:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] ipv6: remove some useless RCU read lock Cong Wang
2012-08-17 18:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] ipv6: do not hold route table lock when send ndisc probe Debabrata Banerjee
2012-08-20 12:15 ` Cong Wang
2012-08-21 3:44 ` Cong Wang
2012-08-22 16:04 ` Banerjee, Debabrata
2012-08-23 9:11 ` Cong Wang
2012-08-23 16:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-24 9:15 ` Cong Wang
2012-08-24 9:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-24 10:45 ` Cong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1345187499-16929-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com \
--to=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dbanerje@akamai.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).