From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] sched: Add a new API to find the prefer idlest
 cpu
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 18:48:54 +0200
Message-ID: <1345222134.29668.63.camel@twins>
References: <1343026634.13461.15.camel@oc3660625478.ibm.com>
	 <1345217986.16533.1.camel@oc3660625478.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	vivek@us.ibm.com, sri@us.ibm.com
To: Shirley Ma <mashirle@us.ibm.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:51287 "EHLO
	casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1758423Ab2HQQtH convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 17 Aug 2012 12:49:07 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1345217986.16533.1.camel@oc3660625478.ibm.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 08:39 -0700, Shirley Ma wrote:

> Hello Ingo, Peter,
>         Have you had chance to review below patch?

Well no of course not, nobody CC'ed us..

Your patch submission sucks, you split the changelog and the actual
patch into two different emails.

It doesn't mention who would be calling this and how often. Nor does it
seem to explain where the cpumask arguments come from.

Please try again.