From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: "Michal Kubeček" <mkubecek@suse.cz>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
Shan Wei <shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch net-next] ipv6: unify conntrack reassembly expire code with standard one
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 17:06:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1345453599.22373.9.camel@cr0> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1826853.rak2U42CMU@alaris>
Hi, Michal!
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 19:05 +0200, Michal Kubeček wrote:
> On Friday 17 of August 2012 16:02EN, Cong Wang wrote:
> > Two years ago, Shan Wei tried to fix this:
> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/43905/
> >
> ...
> >
> > As Herbert suggested, we could actually use the standard IPv6
> > reassembly code which follows RFC2460.
>
> I tested the patch and I ran into a problem in this place in
> ip6_expire_frag_queue():
>
> > net = container_of(fq->q.net, struct net, ipv6.frags);
>
> For frag queues coming from IPv6 conntrack, fq->q.net points to
> nf_init_frags which is not embedded into struct net so that the
> following device lookup leads to reading from an invalid address.
> The same problem has been discussed on the page linked above.
>
> I didn't test with current net-next source but as far as I can tell,
> this hasn't changed. Did I miss something?
>
No, you don't miss anything. I missed that piece of code, you are right
that nf_init_frags is not actually embedded, so that container_of()
doesn't work. I think we probably can save the struct net pointer in
struct netns_frags during inet_frags_init_net(), so that container_of()
can be eliminated.
Thanks for testing! I tried to test it too, but seems I can't trigger a
defragment. Any hints?
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-20 9:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-17 8:02 [RFC Patch net-next] ipv6: unify conntrack reassembly expire code with standard one Cong Wang
2012-08-17 17:05 ` Michal Kubeček
2012-08-20 9:06 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2012-08-20 20:21 ` Michal Kubecek
2012-08-21 13:38 ` Cong Wang
2012-08-24 10:13 ` Cong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1345453599.22373.9.camel@cr0 \
--to=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).