From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org,
neilb@suse.de, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, michaelc@cs.wisc.edu,
emunson@mgebm.net, sebastian@breakpoint.cc, cl@linux.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: regression with poll(2)
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 07:16:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1345526171.5158.364.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120820162046.f827f758.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 16:20 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:30:59 +0200
> Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 10:04 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> >
> > > Can the following patch be tested please? It is reported to fix an fio
> > > regression that may be similar to what you are experiencing but has not
> > > been picked up yet.
> > >
> > > -
> >
> > This seems to help here.
> >
> > Boot your machine with "mem=768M" or a bit less depending on your setup,
> > and try a netperf.
> >
> > -> before patch :
> >
> > # netperf
> > MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to
> > localhost.localdomain () port 0 AF_INET
> > Recv Send Send
> > Socket Socket Message Elapsed
> > Size Size Size Time Throughput
> > bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
> >
> > 87380 16384 16384 14.00 6.05
> >
> > -> after patch :
> >
> > Recv Send Send
> > Socket Socket Message Elapsed
> > Size Size Size Time Throughput
> > bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
> >
> > 87380 16384 16384 10.00 18509.73
>
> "seem to help"? Was previous performance fully restored?
I did some tests this morning on my HP Z600, and got same numbers than
3.5.0
Of course, its a bit difficult to say, because there is no
CONFIG_PFMEMALLOC to test real impact.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-21 5:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-15 19:46 regression with poll(2)? Sage Weil
2012-08-15 20:45 ` Atchley, Scott
2012-08-15 21:03 ` Sage Weil
2012-08-19 18:49 ` regression with poll(2) Sage Weil
2012-08-20 8:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-20 9:04 ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-20 9:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-20 23:20 ` Andrew Morton
2012-08-21 5:16 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2012-08-20 16:54 ` Sage Weil
2012-08-21 7:05 ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-20 17:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-21 15:58 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1345526171.5158.364.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=emunson@mgebm.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sage@inktank.com \
--cc=sebastian@breakpoint.cc \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox