netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
	Shan Wei <shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch net-next] ipv6: unify conntrack reassembly expire code with standard one
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 21:38:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1345556338.3044.1.camel@cr0> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120820202109.GB28790@unicorn.suse.cz>

On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 22:21 +0200, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 05:06:39PM +0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> > doesn't work. I think we probably can save the struct net pointer in
> > struct netns_frags during inet_frags_init_net(), so that container_of()
> > can be eliminated. 
> 
> This would work but one would have to check carefully that the pointer
> is always set to an usable value. Or we could just add a flag indicating
> whether the structure is embedded (and if it is not, use init_net).
> Another approach was suggested in the patchworks discussion: add a
> special namespace for IPv6 conntrack fragment handling.

I think your former solution is easier, I will try it.

> 
> > Thanks for testing! I tried to test it too, but seems I can't trigger a
> > defragment. Any hints?
> 
> I used netfilter on a computer between source and destination of the 
> packets (generated with "ping6 -s 3000"):
> 
> ip6tables -A FORWARD -o ... -m frag --fragid 0:0xFFFFFFFF --fraglast -j DROP
> 
> The --fragid condition is needed to work around a bug in iptables (if 
> frag module is loaded and there is no --fragid, only packets with zero
> fragment id match - patch for this is already in git). On the target,
> packet is defragmented automatically, by default by the "normal" code,
> with nf_conntrack_ipv6 module by the conntrack code.
> 
> Setting
> 
>   echo 5 >/proc/sys/net/ipv6/ip6frag_time
>   echo 5 >/proc/sys/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_frag6_timeout
> 
> on target also helps.
> 

Great! This helps!

Thanks!


  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-21 13:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-17  8:02 [RFC Patch net-next] ipv6: unify conntrack reassembly expire code with standard one Cong Wang
2012-08-17 17:05 ` Michal Kubeček
2012-08-20  9:06   ` Cong Wang
2012-08-20 20:21     ` Michal Kubecek
2012-08-21 13:38       ` Cong Wang [this message]
2012-08-24 10:13       ` Cong Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1345556338.3044.1.camel@cr0 \
    --to=amwang@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).