public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Gao feng <gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: dev: fix the incorrect hold of net namespace's lo device
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:24:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1345634667.5158.1114.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5034BBBB.6080307@cn.fujitsu.com>

On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 19:00 +0800, Gao feng wrote:

> Hi Eric
> 
> I saw your patch and think this patch is clear and doesn't change too much logic.
> 
> I test your patch, it not fix this problem.
> 
> In my test case,when moving a net device to another net namespace,
> Because you patch delete NETDEV_UNREGISTER event from dst_dev_event,
> we will just put dst entries into the dst garbage list in event
> NETDEV_DOWN,without call dst_ifdown to change these dst entries' device
> to the lo device,and now this net device belongs to the new net namespace.
> 

Then fix the "moving a net device to another net namespace", instead
of slowing down other common operations.

dev_change_net_namespace() is probably a better place to put your patch

> After the net device beeing moved to another net namespace, I rmmod this
> net device's driver,this will trigger the new added event NETDEV_UNREGISTER_FINISH,
> so in dst_dev_event,we will change these dst entries's device to the new net
> namespace's lo device,and this will make the referenct count of the new net namespace's
> lo device incorrect. when we exit the new net namespace,this emg message is still exist.
> 
> Message from syslogd@Donkey at Aug 22 18:50:13 ...
>  kernel:[ 1161.979036] unregister_netdevice: waiting for lo to become free. Usage count = 1
> 
> And because net_mutex is locked here,so we can't create new net namespace.
> 
> > rcu_barrier() at this place will kill some workloads.
> > 
> 
> I think this will only add some workloads when unregister a net device.
> Do I miss something?

Yes, rcu_barrier() at this point is killing performance, because we hold
RTNL.

We worked hard to batch things, your patch is a huge step backward.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-22 11:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-22  8:31 [PATCH] net: dev: fix the incorrect hold of net namespace's lo device Gao feng
2012-08-22  8:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-22 11:00   ` Gao feng
2012-08-22 11:24     ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2012-08-23  3:09       ` Gao feng
2012-08-23  3:13   ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1345634667.5158.1114.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox