From: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net, ncardwell@google.com, nanditad@google.com
Cc: mattmathis@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH] net-tcp: fix cwnd reduction for non-sack recovery
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:05:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1345741517-30504-1-git-send-email-ycheng@google.com> (raw)
The cwnd reduction in fast recovery is based on the number of packets
newly delivered per ACK. For non-sack connections every DUPACK
signifies a packet has been delivered, but the sender mistakenly
skips counting them for cwnd reduction.
The fix is to compute newly_acked_sacked after DUPACKs are accounted
in sacked_out for non-sack connections.
Signed-off-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 15 +++++++--------
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index bcfccc5..ce4ffe9 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -2930,13 +2930,14 @@ static void tcp_enter_recovery(struct sock *sk, bool ece_ack)
* tcp_xmit_retransmit_queue().
*/
static void tcp_fastretrans_alert(struct sock *sk, int pkts_acked,
- int newly_acked_sacked, bool is_dupack,
+ int prior_sacked, bool is_dupack,
int flag)
{
struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk);
struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
int do_lost = is_dupack || ((flag & FLAG_DATA_SACKED) &&
(tcp_fackets_out(tp) > tp->reordering));
+ int newly_acked_sacked = 0;
int fast_rexmit = 0;
if (WARN_ON(!tp->packets_out && tp->sacked_out))
@@ -2996,6 +2997,7 @@ static void tcp_fastretrans_alert(struct sock *sk, int pkts_acked,
tcp_add_reno_sack(sk);
} else
do_lost = tcp_try_undo_partial(sk, pkts_acked);
+ newly_acked_sacked = pkts_acked + tp->sacked_out - prior_sacked;
break;
case TCP_CA_Loss:
if (flag & FLAG_DATA_ACKED)
@@ -3017,6 +3019,7 @@ static void tcp_fastretrans_alert(struct sock *sk, int pkts_acked,
if (is_dupack)
tcp_add_reno_sack(sk);
}
+ newly_acked_sacked = pkts_acked + tp->sacked_out - prior_sacked;
if (icsk->icsk_ca_state <= TCP_CA_Disorder)
tcp_try_undo_dsack(sk);
@@ -3594,7 +3597,6 @@ static int tcp_ack(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb, int flag)
int prior_packets;
int prior_sacked = tp->sacked_out;
int pkts_acked = 0;
- int newly_acked_sacked = 0;
bool frto_cwnd = false;
/* If the ack is older than previous acks
@@ -3670,8 +3672,6 @@ static int tcp_ack(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb, int flag)
flag |= tcp_clean_rtx_queue(sk, prior_fackets, prior_snd_una);
pkts_acked = prior_packets - tp->packets_out;
- newly_acked_sacked = (prior_packets - prior_sacked) -
- (tp->packets_out - tp->sacked_out);
if (tp->frto_counter)
frto_cwnd = tcp_process_frto(sk, flag);
@@ -3685,7 +3685,7 @@ static int tcp_ack(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb, int flag)
tcp_may_raise_cwnd(sk, flag))
tcp_cong_avoid(sk, ack, prior_in_flight);
is_dupack = !(flag & (FLAG_SND_UNA_ADVANCED | FLAG_NOT_DUP));
- tcp_fastretrans_alert(sk, pkts_acked, newly_acked_sacked,
+ tcp_fastretrans_alert(sk, pkts_acked, prior_sacked,
is_dupack, flag);
} else {
if ((flag & FLAG_DATA_ACKED) && !frto_cwnd)
@@ -3702,7 +3702,7 @@ static int tcp_ack(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb, int flag)
no_queue:
/* If data was DSACKed, see if we can undo a cwnd reduction. */
if (flag & FLAG_DSACKING_ACK)
- tcp_fastretrans_alert(sk, pkts_acked, newly_acked_sacked,
+ tcp_fastretrans_alert(sk, pkts_acked, prior_sacked,
is_dupack, flag);
/* If this ack opens up a zero window, clear backoff. It was
* being used to time the probes, and is probably far higher than
@@ -3722,8 +3722,7 @@ old_ack:
*/
if (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->sacked) {
flag |= tcp_sacktag_write_queue(sk, skb, prior_snd_una);
- newly_acked_sacked = tp->sacked_out - prior_sacked;
- tcp_fastretrans_alert(sk, pkts_acked, newly_acked_sacked,
+ tcp_fastretrans_alert(sk, pkts_acked, prior_sacked,
is_dupack, flag);
}
--
1.7.7.3
next reply other threads:[~2012-08-23 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-23 17:05 Yuchung Cheng [this message]
2012-08-23 17:21 ` [PATCH] net-tcp: fix cwnd reduction for non-sack recovery Nandita Dukkipati
2012-08-23 17:25 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-08-24 17:49 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1345741517-30504-1-git-send-email-ycheng@google.com \
--to=ycheng@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=mattmathis@google.com \
--cc=nanditad@google.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).