netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Debabrata Banerjee <dbavatar@gmail.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Banerjee,
	Debabrata" <dbanerje@akamai.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ipv6: do not hold route table lock when send ndisc probe
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 18:45:40 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1345805140.9305.1.camel@cr0> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1345801484.29722.2.camel@edumazet-glaptop>

On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 11:44 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 17:15 +0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Right... If we call dev_hold() in the work, it is possible that the work
> > is still not scheduled to running when we unregister the device. What's
> > more, we can't flush work here as we are holding a read lock.
> 
> You need a global list (and a single work, not one per req), so that a
> notifier can flush it at demand.
> 
> 

Agreed. I will make a new patch.

Thanks!

      reply	other threads:[~2012-08-24 10:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-17  7:11 [PATCH 1/2] ipv6: do not hold route table lock when send ndisc probe Cong Wang
2012-08-17  7:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] ipv6: remove some useless RCU read lock Cong Wang
2012-08-17 18:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] ipv6: do not hold route table lock when send ndisc probe Debabrata Banerjee
2012-08-20 12:15   ` Cong Wang
2012-08-21  3:44   ` Cong Wang
2012-08-22 16:04     ` Banerjee, Debabrata
2012-08-23  9:11       ` Cong Wang
2012-08-23 16:10     ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-24  9:15       ` Cong Wang
2012-08-24  9:44         ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-24 10:45           ` Cong Wang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1345805140.9305.1.camel@cr0 \
    --to=amwang@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dbanerje@akamai.com \
    --cc=dbavatar@gmail.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).