From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: shemminger@vyatta.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ipv4: Properly purge netdev references on uncached routes.
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:40:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1345822847.19483.8.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120731.160408.994710172149748635.davem@davemloft.net>
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 16:04 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 15:44:55 -0700
>
> > On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 15:20:33 -0700 (PDT)
> > David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> When a device is unregistered, we have to purge all of the
> >> references to it that may exist in the entire system.
> >>
> >> If a route is uncached, we currently have no way of accomplishing
> >> this.
> >>
> >> So create a global list that is scanned when a network device goes
> >> down. This mirrors the logic in net/core/dst.c's dst_ifdown().
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> >
> > What about systems will full 1M route table?
> > I wonder if doing rbtree here would make the search faster?
>
> It only happens for routes like 255.255.255.255 and for those who
> use tclassid on input.
>
> Everything else is cached in the existing FIB trie entries.
We might have an SMP performance regression on multicast traffic,
because DST_NOCACHE is set on such routes.
What about the following ?
Thanks
[PATCH] ipv4: take rt_uncached_lock only if needed
Multicast traffic allocates dst with DST_NOCACHE, but dst is
not inserted into rt_uncached_list.
This slowdown multicast workloads on SMP because rt_uncached_lock is
contended.
Change the test before taking the lock to actually check the dst
was inserted into rt_uncached_list.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
---
net/ipv4/route.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
index 8c8c748..24fd4c5 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
@@ -1263,7 +1263,7 @@ static void ipv4_dst_destroy(struct dst_entry *dst)
{
struct rtable *rt = (struct rtable *) dst;
- if (dst->flags & DST_NOCACHE) {
+ if (!list_empty(&rt->rt_uncached)) {
spin_lock_bh(&rt_uncached_lock);
list_del(&rt->rt_uncached);
spin_unlock_bh(&rt_uncached_lock);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-24 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-31 22:20 [PATCH 2/2] ipv4: Properly purge netdev references on uncached routes David Miller
2012-07-31 22:44 ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-07-31 23:04 ` David Miller
2012-08-24 15:40 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2012-08-24 15:45 ` David Miller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-07-31 1:23 David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1345822847.19483.8.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox