From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] tcp: add generic netlink support for tcp_metrics
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 02:45:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1346633144.2563.97.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1346564178-1794-2-git-send-email-ja@ssi.bg>
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 08:36 +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> +
> +static int tcp_metrics_flush_all(struct net *net)
> +{
> + unsigned int max_rows = 1U << net->ipv4.tcp_metrics_hash_log;
> + struct tcpm_hash_bucket *hb = net->ipv4.tcp_metrics_hash;
> + struct tcp_metrics_block *tm;
> + unsigned int sync_count = 0;
> + unsigned int row;
> +
> + for (row = 0; row < max_rows; row++, hb++) {
> + spin_lock_bh(&tcp_metrics_lock);
> + tm = deref_locked_genl(hb->chain);
> + if (tm)
> + hb->chain = NULL;
> + spin_unlock_bh(&tcp_metrics_lock);
> + while (tm) {
> + struct tcp_metrics_block *next;
> +
> + next = deref_genl(tm->tcpm_next);
> + kfree_rcu(tm, rcu_head);
> + if (!((++sync_count) & 2047))
> + synchronize_rcu();
> + tm = next;
> + }
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
It looks like the synchronize_rcu() call is not exactly what you wanted,
but then net/ipv4/fib_trie.c has the same mistake.
What we want here is to force pending call_rcu() calls to complete, so
that we dont consume too much memory. So it would probably better to
call rcu_barrier() instead.
If other cpus are idle or outside of rcu read lock sections,
synchronize_rcu() should basically do nothing at all.
But I am not sure its worth the trouble ?
Commit c3059477fce2d956a0bb3e04357324780c5d8eeb (ipv4: Use
synchronize_rcu() during trie_rebalance()) was needed because FIB TRIE
can really use huge amounts of memory, thats hardly the case with
tcp_metrics.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-03 0:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-02 5:36 [PATCH v2 0/2] Interface for TCP Metrics Julian Anastasov
2012-09-02 5:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] tcp: add generic netlink support for tcp_metrics Julian Anastasov
2012-09-03 0:45 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2012-09-03 8:22 ` Julian Anastasov
2012-09-04 19:47 ` David Miller
2012-09-04 21:00 ` Julian Anastasov
2012-09-02 5:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] iproute2: add " Julian Anastasov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1346633144.2563.97.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ja@ssi.bg \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox