Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@iki.fi>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: IPv6 routing type - not at par with IPv4 one?
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 12:35:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1346927705.2484.22.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <loom.20120906T115737-277@post.gmane.org>

On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 10:02 +0000, Markus Stenberg wrote:
> ~ # ip route add throw 1.2.3.4
> ~ # ip -6 route add throw ::1.2.3.4
> RTNETLINK answers: No such device
> ~ # ip route add blackhole 1.2.3.5
> ~ # ip -6 route add blackhole ::1.2.3.5
> RTNETLINK answers: No such device
> ~ #
> 
> The reason for this is in net/ipv6/route.c - ipv6_route_add:
> 
> Eventually code winds up at this (1423 line in 3.5.3):
> 
> 	err = -ENODEV;
> 	if (!dev)
> 		goto out;
> 
> and poof, ENODEV.
> 
> Is there some reason for this? Or should I write a patch? 
> Or does someone else want to? Support for dev=NULL 
> elsewhere in the code seems to be ok.
> 
> Based on quick googling I'm not the first one to have encountered this.

Well, it  seems you missed this : 

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git;a=commitdiff;h=ef2c7d7b59708d54213c7556a82d14de9a7e4475

At least the blackhole is now supported on IPv6, so you probably have to
add the 'throw' bit, if it makes any sense.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-06 10:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-06 10:02 IPv6 routing type - not at par with IPv4 one? Markus Stenberg
2012-09-06 10:35 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2012-09-06 10:54   ` Markus
2012-09-06 13:21     ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-06 15:53       ` [PATCH net-next] ipv6: fix handling of throw routes Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-06 13:58         ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-07 18:18         ` David Miller
2012-09-10  7:15           ` Nicolas Dichtel
2013-01-24 10:11             ` Axel Neumann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1346927705.2484.22.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=markus.stenberg@iki.fi \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox