From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dst: take into account policy update on check() Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 17:08:29 +0200 Message-ID: <1347030509.2484.774.camel@edumazet-glaptop> References: <5049FAE3.2050403@6wind.com> <1347033467-3757-1-git-send-email-nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com> <1347033467-3757-2-git-send-email-nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com> <1347028510.2484.736.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <504A09FD.1050201@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Nicolas Dichtel , davem@davemloft.net, sri@us.ibm.com, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Vlad Yasevich Return-path: Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:45690 "EHLO mail-bk0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751394Ab2IGPIe (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Sep 2012 11:08:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <504A09FD.1050201@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 10:51 -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote: > I thought of that too, but that requires hacking xfrm to know the > namespace at the time it changes the flow_cache_genid. This one seems > simpler to do. Simpler maybe, but its yet another test done in fast path.