From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dst: take into account policy update on check() Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 17:09:58 +0200 Message-ID: <1347030598.2484.777.camel@edumazet-glaptop> References: <5049FAE3.2050403@6wind.com> <1347033467-3757-1-git-send-email-nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com> <1347033467-3757-2-git-send-email-nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com> <1347028510.2484.736.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <504A08EA.3080506@6wind.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: vyasevich@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, sri@us.ibm.com, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com Return-path: Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:35412 "EHLO mail-bk0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751394Ab2IGPKD (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Sep 2012 11:10:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <504A08EA.3080506@6wind.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 16:47 +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote: > Le 07/09/2012 16:35, Eric Dumazet a =C3=A9crit : > > > > Hmm... cant we reuse rt_genid ? > > > > (When changing flow_cache_genid, change &net->ipv4.rt_genid) >=20 > And so adding a new field in net->ipv6? or move net->ipv4.rt_genid to net->rt_genid Having separate field for IPv4/IPv6 is of little interest IMHO