From: Chema Gonzalez <chema@google.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, edumazet@google.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Chema Gonzalez <chema@berkeley.edu>,
Chema Gonzalez <chema@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH] net: small bug on rxhash calculation
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 16:40:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1347061251-2019-1-git-send-email-chema@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120907.125748.25526531079163699.davem@davemloft.net>
In the current rxhash calculation function, while the
sorting of the ports/addrs is coherent (you get the
same rxhash for packets sharing the same 4-tuple, in
both directions), ports and addrs are sorted
independently. This implies packets from a connection
between the same addresses but crossed ports hash to
the same rxhash.
For example, traffic between A=S:l and B=L:s is hashed
(in both directions) from {L, S, {s, l}}. The same
rxhash is obtained for packets between C=S:s and D=L:l.
This patch ensures that you either swap both addrs and ports,
or you swap none. Traffic between A and B, and traffic
between C and D, get their rxhash from different sources
({L, S, {l, s}} for A<->B, and {L, S, {s, l}} for C<->D)
The patch is co-written with Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Chema Gonzalez <chema@google.com>
---
net/core/dev.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index b1e6d63..dcc673d 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -2655,15 +2655,16 @@ void __skb_get_rxhash(struct sk_buff *skb)
if (!skb_flow_dissect(skb, &keys))
return;
- if (keys.ports) {
- if ((__force u16)keys.port16[1] < (__force u16)keys.port16[0])
- swap(keys.port16[0], keys.port16[1]);
+ if (keys.ports)
skb->l4_rxhash = 1;
- }
/* get a consistent hash (same value on both flow directions) */
- if ((__force u32)keys.dst < (__force u32)keys.src)
+ if (((__force u32)keys.dst < (__force u32)keys.src) ||
+ (((__force u32)keys.dst == (__force u32)keys.src) &&
+ ((__force u16)keys.port16[1] < (__force u16)keys.port16[0]))) {
swap(keys.dst, keys.src);
+ swap(keys.port16[0], keys.port16[1]);
+ }
hash = jhash_3words((__force u32)keys.dst,
(__force u32)keys.src,
--
1.7.7.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-07 23:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-06 6:35 [PATCH] net: Small bug on rxhash calculation Chema Gonzalez
2012-09-06 6:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-07 16:57 ` David Miller
2012-09-07 23:40 ` Chema Gonzalez [this message]
2012-09-07 23:40 ` [PATCH] net: small " Chema Gonzalez
2012-09-07 23:50 ` David Miller
2012-09-08 0:24 ` Chema Gonzalez
2012-09-08 8:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-08 22:43 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1347061251-2019-1-git-send-email-chema@google.com \
--to=chema@google.com \
--cc=chema@berkeley.edu \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).