From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
George Bakos <gbakos@alpinista.org>,
tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org,
Jay Schulist <jschlst@samba.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [tcpdump-workers] Modular arithmetic
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 11:25:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1347269124.1234.1326.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AE90C24D6B3A694183C094C60CF0A2F6026B6FE4@saturn3.aculab.com>
On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 09:41 +0100, David Laight wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 07:49:10AM +0000, George Bakos wrote:
> > > Gents,
> > > Any fundamental reason why the following (, etc.) shouldn't be
> > > included in net/core/filter.c?
> > >
> > > case BPF_S_ALU_MOD_X:
> > > if (X == 0)
> > > return 0;
> > > A %= X;
> > > continue;
> >
> > Copying netdev.
> >
> > In principle no reason against it, but you may need to update
> > the various BPF JITs too that Linux now has too.
>
> What about the other OS - eg all the BSDs?
> I had a vague idea that BPF was supposed to be reasonable portable.
Yes, does it mean BPF is frozen ?
Or is BSD so hard to update these days ?
modulus can be implemented using fallback to div and sub, I am not sure
libpcap should sense kernel support or not.
George, make sure libpcap optimizer correctly replaces MOD X by AND (X
- 1) if X is a power of two.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-10 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20120905213941.03c85968@arrowsmith>
[not found] ` <C71A36A8-08D2-4D3D-AF2B-EF89FEECE1A6@alum.mit.edu>
[not found] ` <20120906073615.693d14e0@arrowsmith>
[not found] ` <46AB14E3-73F4-41FA-8086-F1D663AF4549@alum.mit.edu>
[not found] ` <20120907074910.2df46817@arrowsmith>
2012-09-08 3:03 ` [tcpdump-workers] Modular arithmetic Andi Kleen
2012-09-08 8:03 ` [PATCH net-next] filter: add MOD operation Eric Dumazet
2012-09-08 20:31 ` George Bakos
2012-09-10 19:45 ` David Miller
2012-09-10 20:48 ` [PATCH net-next] x86 bpf_jit: support " Eric Dumazet
2012-09-10 21:09 ` David Miller
2012-09-10 8:41 ` [tcpdump-workers] Modular arithmetic David Laight
2012-09-10 9:25 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2012-09-10 10:41 ` David Laight
2012-09-10 11:49 ` [tcpdump-workers] " Daniel Borkmann
2012-09-10 17:50 ` Guy Harris
2014-05-18 18:26 ` Guy Harris
2012-09-10 14:49 ` [tcpdump-workers] " Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1347269124.1234.1326.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gbakos@alpinista.org \
--cc=jschlst@samba.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox