From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] ipv6: fix the reassembly expire code in nf_conntrack
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 10:34:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1347935656.14402.12.camel@cr0> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120917.125925.930848734158369358.davem@davemloft.net>
On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 12:59 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 12:54:19 -0400 (EDT)
>
> > From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
> > Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 14:25:37 +0800
> >
> >> ipv6: add a new namespace for nf_conntrack_reasm
> >> ipv6: unify conntrack reassembly expire code with
> >> ipv6: make ip6_frag_nqueues() and ip6_frag_mem() static
> >> ipv6: unify fragment thresh handling code
> >>
> >> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
> >> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> >> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
> >
> > These changes look great, all applied to net-next, thanks.
>
> I have to ask if you actually build tested this change at all:
>
> net/ipv6/proc.c: In function ‘sockstat6_seq_show’:
> net/ipv6/proc.c:46:10: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ip6_frag_nqueues’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> net/ipv6/proc.c:46:10: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ip6_frag_mem’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>
> It is absolutely impossible for you to have enabled ipv6 and not gotten
> that build error.
Weird, I don't see any build error:
% grep CONFIG_IPV6 .config
CONFIG_IPV6=y
CONFIG_IPV6_PRIVACY=y
CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTER_PREF=y
CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTE_INFO=y
CONFIG_IPV6_OPTIMISTIC_DAD=y
CONFIG_IPV6_MIP6=y
CONFIG_IPV6_SIT=y
CONFIG_IPV6_SIT_6RD=y
CONFIG_IPV6_NDISC_NODETYPE=y
CONFIG_IPV6_TUNNEL=y
CONFIG_IPV6_GRE=y
CONFIG_IPV6_MULTIPLE_TABLES=y
CONFIG_IPV6_SUBTREES=y
CONFIG_IPV6_MROUTE=y
CONFIG_IPV6_MROUTE_MULTIPLE_TABLES=y
CONFIG_IPV6_PIMSM_V2=y
% rm net/ipv6/proc.o
% make net/ipv6/proc.o
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `relocs'.
CHK include/linux/version.h
CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h
CC kernel/bounds.s
GEN include/generated/bounds.h
CC arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.s
GEN include/generated/asm-offsets.h
CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
CC scripts/mod/empty.o
MKELF scripts/mod/elfconfig.h
HOSTCC scripts/mod/file2alias.o
HOSTCC scripts/mod/modpost.o
HOSTCC scripts/mod/sumversion.o
HOSTLD scripts/mod/modpost
CC net/ipv6/proc.o
Rebuild the whole tree:
...
CC net/ipv6/ip6mr.o
CC net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.o
CC net/ipv6/xfrm6_state.o
CC net/ipv6/xfrm6_input.o
CC net/ipv6/xfrm6_output.o
CC net/ipv6/netfilter.o
CC net/ipv6/fib6_rules.o
CC net/ipv6/proc.o
CC net/ipv6/syncookies.o
LD net/ipv6/ipv6.o
CC net/ipv6/ah6.o
CC net/ipv6/esp6.o
CC net/ipv6/ipcomp6.o
CC net/ipv6/xfrm6_tunnel.o
CC net/ipv6/tunnel6.o
...
% gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.6.3 20120306 (Red Hat 4.6.3-2)
Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is
NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
PURPOSE.
>
> The only logical explanation is that you didn't commit the changes
> to net/ipv6/proc.c in your tree when you put together these patches.
There is no change for net/ipv6/proc.c, ip6_frag_nqueues() and
ip6_frag_mem() are now defined as static inline in include/net/ipv6.h
which is already #included by net/ipv6/proc.c. This is why I still don't
see how that build error could happen.
Actually, the #ifdef CONFIG_IPV6 is not needed at all, as
sockstat6_seq_show() is their only caller, which is compiled only when
CONFIG_IPV6 is enabled.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-18 2:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-13 6:25 [PATCH net-next 0/4] ipv6: fix the reassembly expire code in nf_conntrack Cong Wang
2012-09-13 6:25 ` [PATCH 1/4] ipv6: add a new namespace for nf_conntrack_reasm Cong Wang
2012-09-13 6:25 ` [PATCH 2/4] ipv6: unify conntrack reassembly expire code with standard one Cong Wang
2012-09-13 6:25 ` [PATCH 3/4] ipv6: make ip6_frag_nqueues() and ip6_frag_mem() static inline Cong Wang
2012-09-13 6:25 ` [PATCH 4/4] ipv6: unify fragment thresh handling code Cong Wang
2012-09-17 3:13 ` [PATCH net-next 0/4] ipv6: fix the reassembly expire code in nf_conntrack Cong Wang
2012-09-17 16:54 ` David Miller
2012-09-17 16:59 ` David Miller
2012-09-18 2:34 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2012-09-18 2:35 ` David Miller
2012-09-18 2:47 ` Cong Wang
2012-09-18 2:53 ` David Miller
2012-09-18 3:04 ` Cong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1347935656.14402.12.camel@cr0 \
--to=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).