From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] ipv6: fix the reassembly expire code in nf_conntrack
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 11:04:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1347937446.14402.17.camel@cr0> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120917.225304.1071254088219136410.davem@davemloft.net>
On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 22:53 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 10:47:23 +0800
>
> > I will remove this #ifdef and resend the whole patchset.
>
> Or, alternatively, use IS_ENABLED() or a similar test which will take
> the modular case into account.
>
Yeah, actually net->ipv6 is also defined with #if
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6), so IS_ENABLED() is the right fix.
Thanks!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-18 3:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-13 6:25 [PATCH net-next 0/4] ipv6: fix the reassembly expire code in nf_conntrack Cong Wang
2012-09-13 6:25 ` [PATCH 1/4] ipv6: add a new namespace for nf_conntrack_reasm Cong Wang
2012-09-13 6:25 ` [PATCH 2/4] ipv6: unify conntrack reassembly expire code with standard one Cong Wang
2012-09-13 6:25 ` [PATCH 3/4] ipv6: make ip6_frag_nqueues() and ip6_frag_mem() static inline Cong Wang
2012-09-13 6:25 ` [PATCH 4/4] ipv6: unify fragment thresh handling code Cong Wang
2012-09-17 3:13 ` [PATCH net-next 0/4] ipv6: fix the reassembly expire code in nf_conntrack Cong Wang
2012-09-17 16:54 ` David Miller
2012-09-17 16:59 ` David Miller
2012-09-18 2:34 ` Cong Wang
2012-09-18 2:35 ` David Miller
2012-09-18 2:47 ` Cong Wang
2012-09-18 2:53 ` David Miller
2012-09-18 3:04 ` Cong Wang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1347937446.14402.17.camel@cr0 \
--to=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).