Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: "David Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Maciej Żenczykowski" <maze@google.com>,
	"Tom Herbert" <therbert@google.com>,
	"Lorenzo Colitti" <lorenzo@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: only run neigh_forced_gc() from one cpu
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:09:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1348052957.26523.680.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1348052825.26523.676.camel@edumazet-glaptop>

On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 13:07 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 06:50 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> 
> > This is going to cause callers in neigh_alloc to immediately fail their
> > allocation attempts.  Would it be a good idea to modify that call site so that
> > instead of returning NULL, instead reread tbl->entries before comparing to
> > gc_thresh3, on the hope that the cpu in the garbage collecting routine has freed
> > some entries?
> 
> neigh_alloc() fails only if gc_thresh3 is hit, and if it is hit, we are
> under attack by definition.
> 
> (the gc is run every 5 seconds is above gc_thresh2, and below
> gc_thresh3)
> 
> No matter what you try, the attacker is going to be the winner.
> 
> The best thing here is to drop packets, not spending several milli
> seconds to serve one packet, as queues are going to tail drop anyway.
> 

I meant several hundred of milli seconds per packet.

In our tests we even trigger a softlockup, so thats more than 10 seconds
waiting for the rwlock, for a single packet.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-19 11:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-19  9:27 [PATCH net-next] net: only run neigh_forced_gc() from one cpu Eric Dumazet
2012-09-19 10:50 ` Neil Horman
2012-09-19 11:07   ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-19 11:09     ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2012-09-19 12:54       ` Neil Horman
2012-09-19 17:45 ` David Miller
     [not found]   ` <CAKD1Yr11twYakD=-Mn8FiB11-xtyOLb-Q6XWmiE3H63SFRbzUw@mail.gmail.com>
2012-09-20  3:51     ` David Miller
2012-09-20 11:22       ` Lorenzo Colitti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1348052957.26523.680.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=lorenzo@google.com \
    --cc=maze@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=therbert@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox