From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: enh <enh@google.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: listen(2) backlog changes in or around Linux 3.1?
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:54:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1350579240.32642.62.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJgzZoq9+KZpQ1tVQJUK++VVk4JfY9u8timaJ5q6wSYoF+_tog@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 16:31 -0700, enh wrote:
> boiling things down to a short C++ program, i see that i can reproduce
> the behavior even on 2.6 kernels. if i run this, i see 4 connections
> immediately (3 + 1, as i'd expect)... but then about 10s later i see
> another 2. and every few seconds after that, i see another 2. i've let
> this run until i have hundreds of connect(2) calls that have returned,
> despite my small listen(2) backlog and the fact that i'm not
> accept(2)ing.
>
> so i guess the only thing that's changed with newer kernels is timing
> (hell, since i only see newer kernels on newer hardware, it might just
> be a hardware thing).
>
> and clearly i don't understand what the listen(2) backlog means any more.
Hi Elliott
I would say there is a bug (or several !!), and this needs a fix.
I am investigating.
Thanks
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-18 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-12 23:40 listen(2) backlog changes in or around Linux 3.1? enh
2012-10-15 17:12 ` Venkat Venkatsubra
2012-10-15 17:26 ` enh
2012-10-15 21:30 ` Venkat Venkatsubra
2012-10-16 23:31 ` enh
2012-10-18 16:00 ` Venkat Venkatsubra
2012-10-18 16:53 ` Venkat Venkatsubra
2012-10-18 17:20 ` enh
2012-10-19 6:02 ` Vijay Subramanian
2012-10-19 6:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-19 8:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-19 9:14 ` Vijay Subramanian
2012-10-19 10:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-19 11:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-22 20:00 ` Vijay Subramanian
2012-10-22 20:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-22 22:11 ` Vijay Subramanian
2012-10-25 22:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-25 23:16 ` Vijay Subramanian
2012-10-18 16:54 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1350579240.32642.62.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=enh@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox