public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
Cc: Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] sockopt: Make SO_BINDTODEVICE readable
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 12:34:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1350642889.2293.419.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <508123AC.5080208@parallels.com>

On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 13:55 +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> The SO_BINDTODEVICE option is the only SOL_SOCKET one that can be set, but
> cannot be get via sockopt API. The only way we can find the device id a
> socket is bound to is via sock-diag interface. But the diag works only on
> hashed sockets, while the opt in question can be set for yet unhashed one.
> 
> That said, in order to know what device a socket is bound to (we do want
> to know this in checkpoint-restore project) I propose to make this option
> getsockopt-able and report the respective device index.
> 
> Another solution to the problem might be to teach the sock-diag reporting
> info on unhashed sockets. Should I go this way instead?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> index 8a146cf..c49412c 100644
> --- a/net/core/sock.c
> +++ b/net/core/sock.c
> @@ -1074,6 +1074,9 @@ int sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
>  	case SO_NOFCS:
>  		v.val = sock_flag(sk, SOCK_NOFCS);
>  		break;
> +	case SO_BINDTODEVICE:
> +		v.val = sk->sk_bound_dev_if;
> +		break;
>  	default:
>  		return -ENOPROTOOPT;
>  	}

This looks quite reasonable to me.

Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-19 10:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-19  9:55 [PATCH net-next] sockopt: Make SO_BINDTODEVICE readable Pavel Emelyanov
2012-10-19 10:34 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2012-10-22  0:43 ` David Miller
2012-10-22 10:20   ` Pavel Emelyanov
2012-10-22 18:04 ` Brian Haley
2012-10-22 20:28   ` Pavel Emelyanov
2012-10-22 21:23     ` Brian Haley
2012-10-22 20:45   ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-22 21:10     ` Pavel Emelyanov
2012-10-22 21:20     ` Brian Haley
2012-10-22 21:37       ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-22 21:47         ` Brian Haley
2012-10-22 21:52           ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-22 21:58             ` Ben Hutchings
2012-10-23 21:43             ` Brian Haley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1350642889.2293.419.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xemul@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox