From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
Cc: Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] sockopt: Make SO_BINDTODEVICE readable
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 12:34:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1350642889.2293.419.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <508123AC.5080208@parallels.com>
On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 13:55 +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> The SO_BINDTODEVICE option is the only SOL_SOCKET one that can be set, but
> cannot be get via sockopt API. The only way we can find the device id a
> socket is bound to is via sock-diag interface. But the diag works only on
> hashed sockets, while the opt in question can be set for yet unhashed one.
>
> That said, in order to know what device a socket is bound to (we do want
> to know this in checkpoint-restore project) I propose to make this option
> getsockopt-able and report the respective device index.
>
> Another solution to the problem might be to teach the sock-diag reporting
> info on unhashed sockets. Should I go this way instead?
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> index 8a146cf..c49412c 100644
> --- a/net/core/sock.c
> +++ b/net/core/sock.c
> @@ -1074,6 +1074,9 @@ int sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
> case SO_NOFCS:
> v.val = sock_flag(sk, SOCK_NOFCS);
> break;
> + case SO_BINDTODEVICE:
> + v.val = sk->sk_bound_dev_if;
> + break;
> default:
> return -ENOPROTOOPT;
> }
This looks quite reasonable to me.
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-19 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-19 9:55 [PATCH net-next] sockopt: Make SO_BINDTODEVICE readable Pavel Emelyanov
2012-10-19 10:34 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2012-10-22 0:43 ` David Miller
2012-10-22 10:20 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2012-10-22 18:04 ` Brian Haley
2012-10-22 20:28 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2012-10-22 21:23 ` Brian Haley
2012-10-22 20:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-22 21:10 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2012-10-22 21:20 ` Brian Haley
2012-10-22 21:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-22 21:47 ` Brian Haley
2012-10-22 21:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-22 21:58 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-10-23 21:43 ` Brian Haley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1350642889.2293.419.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xemul@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox