From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Kirsher Subject: Re: [net-next 2/8] maintainers: update with official intel support link, new maintainer Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 22:13:40 -0700 Message-ID: <1351055620.2252.40.camel@jtkirshe-mobl> References: <1350987887-16161-1-git-send-email-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> <1350987887-16161-3-git-send-email-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> <1350998701.7502.42.camel@joe-AO722> <1351053166.2252.39.camel@jtkirshe-mobl> <1351054355.7502.102.camel@joe-AO722> Reply-To: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-iH0WkWo7D3AUTWCuwZLw" Cc: Tushar Dave , davem@davemloft.net, Jesse Brandeburg , netdev@vger.kernel.org, gospo@redhat.com, sassmann@redhat.com To: Joe Perches Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:53221 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751381Ab2JXFNm (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Oct 2012 01:13:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1351054355.7502.102.camel@joe-AO722> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-iH0WkWo7D3AUTWCuwZLw Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 21:52 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 21:32 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 06:25 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > > On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 03:24 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote: >=20 > > > > Add the current e1000 maintainer to the list of Intel maintainers. >=20 > > > Maybe add an internal exploder to get all the various > > > maintainers on a list if everyone really looks at all > > > patches to intel drivers. >=20 > > > INTEL ETHERNET DRIVERS > > > M: Jeff Kirsher > > > M: Intel Linux Support > > > T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jkirsher/net.git > > > T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jkirsher/net-nex= t.git > > > S: Supported > > > F: drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ >=20 > > I understand where your coming from and this has been been something > > that I have been trying to find a "reasonable" solution, which is harde= r > > to do than one would expect. > [] > > So how do we go about giving this spider web of complex coverage to som= e > > clear concise coverage in the MAINTAINERS? > [] > > If you have some ideas which may help resolve the issues, I am open to > > suggestions. >=20 > It's great that they all work on all intel drivers, but it seems > that you are the nominal maintainer and they are all developers > that might work on anything but nothing in particular. >=20 > I think an internal exploder email address would work well. >=20 That sounds good, I will discuss it with guys and figure it out. Thanks! --=-iH0WkWo7D3AUTWCuwZLw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABCgAGBQJQh3kEAAoJEOVv75VaS+3OhLIP/RKjk9Sj+q3/o4dG2lw59L5z VrUUMaPlvtAE+XDEOG/uBh5ZVf5BLoFPWIDEuJHeojW76AskFmmLLBqDgle51yPu eHElzjhRUyMVjJw1XKYyvC1vZ8nNTKE/qZiC2gQKZvKT8FTZRx1bte8Mz14YEt8a ExiM5kmcKjbhfBG6GbfXbTXvVUOSRXi6lXsqt+sA7SACHRsLbRbAO/JrFPEfSPNW u//MxqezPlQd89NOI4wxykqm1LnYhZNeyCOTHqurDbI0mT7cT8rCuQl8lo4Ea0a5 KfkTk9RqEMF8Lirku7fcxwgFsuelgI0shPu8CGhCpxuvuw0/HDEYLxJMO1PjRReo 1wLR/hbP7Zfh5mse3sf09b/pHJsL/ZnnXcBwieYQL0u8KNmt3MzvYn+ourgEILyB S+djCBklJRgMQEBe89zfvTVUNSfhXaq0kPUXAZ/ozNCW3sraUH1+6dKprFHqyNu0 +2pSGkDHiGrpoAHOF1iqkraTBRcRfozBxDNpA1fsLV9h3LxuUvyz1PY8k43ypMzA +yftuAZejHkTi29G19Yv34TG8tHOqH/4+8brArrsHMGdXIZNHltbwSyGEXfBtsIb vRlp2q4JHzJzKBPKPq3mgHa2yKRZKZ1NP80rp6Myod2McWy69BArOqMvb9h22qYm oDQtJ/GnBKDVqB+m3UGi =MQuG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-iH0WkWo7D3AUTWCuwZLw--