From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
To: Michael Chan <mchan@broadcom.com>
Cc: 690845@bugs.debian.org, Teodor MICU <mteodor@gmail.com>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#690845: ethtool: incorrect WoL detection on Broadcom NX II rev < 12
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:23:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1351088582.5283.83.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1350958687.8764.170.camel@LTIRV-MCHAN1.corp.ad.broadcom.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1150 bytes --]
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 19:18 -0700, Michael Chan wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 02:45 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Well we knew that much! Is the problem that the system firmware 'owns'
> > the WoL control registers so the host can't safely change them? Is it
> > possible to *read* the WoL configuration, if not to change it?
>
> It's a hardware problem and I don't understand all the details. There
> is an internal PCIX to PCIE bridge on this chip and it gates the NIC's
> PME event. During S5 reset, the bridge gets reset by the BIOS and the
> WoL setting done by the driver will no longer work. Newer chip revs
> have fixed the problem in hardware.
>
> The driver reads the pre-boot WoL setting from NVRAM and it becomes the
> ethtool WoL default setting. Apparently, it is also not working in this
> case. I know that it doesn't work on some LOM designs as the setting is
> actually in BIOS NVRAM as opposed to NIC NVRAM.
Thanks for the explanation. This does seem to be unfixable, then,
unfortunately.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Never attribute to conspiracy what can adequately be explained by stupidity.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-24 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20121018134717.9579.22997.reportbug@palomino.museglobal.com>
[not found] ` <1350570748.26833.102.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
[not found] ` <CAG2Wgfee=qsiUhAk5reYTypcOZL0kM5A58J+LjB1wuQ_k9FrfA@mail.gmail.com>
2012-10-19 1:30 ` Bug#690845: ethtool: incorrect WoL detection on Broadcom NX II rev < 12 Ben Hutchings
2012-10-19 19:38 ` Michael Chan
2012-10-22 7:52 ` Teodor MICU
2012-10-22 22:54 ` Michael Chan
2012-10-23 1:45 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-10-23 2:18 ` Michael Chan
2012-10-24 14:23 ` Ben Hutchings [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1351088582.5283.83.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk \
--to=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=690845@bugs.debian.org \
--cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=mteodor@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox