From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Vijay Subramanian <subramanian.vijay@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
ncardwell@google.com,
Venkat Venkatsubra <venkat.x.venkatsubra@oracle.com>,
Elliott Hughes <enh@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 1/1] tcp: Prevent needless syn-ack rexmt during TWHS
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 10:03:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1351238609.6537.285.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1351238750-13611-1-git-send-email-subramanian.vijay@gmail.com>
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 01:05 -0700, Vijay Subramanian wrote:
> Elliott Hughes <enh@google.com> saw strange behavior when server socket was not
> calling accept(). Client was receiving SYN-ACK back even when socket on server
> side was not yet available. Eric noted server sockets kept resending SYN_ACKS
> and further investigation revealed the following problem.
>
> If server socket is slow to accept() connections, request_socks can represent
> connections for which the three-way handshake is already done. From client's
> point of view, the connection is in ESTABLISHED state but on server side, socket
> is not in accept_queue or ESTABLISHED state. When the syn-ack timer expires,
> because of the order in which tests are performed, server can retransmit the
> synack repeatedly. Following patch prevents the server from retransmitting the
> synack needlessly (and prevents client from replying with ack). This reduces
> traffic when server is slow to accept() connections.
>
> If the server socket has received the third ack during connection establishment,
> this is remembered in inet_rsk(req)->acked. The request_sock will expire in
> around 30 seconds and will be dropped if it does not move into accept_queue.
>
> With help from Eric Dumazet.
>
> Reported-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Acked-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
> Tested-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
> Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vijay Subramanian <subramanian.vijay@gmail.com>
> ---
> Changes from V1: Changed Reported-by tag and commit message. Added Acked-by and
> Tested-by tags.
>
> Ignoring "WARNING: line over 80 characters" in the interest of readability.
>
> net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c | 5 ++---
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
> index d34ce29..4e8e52e 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
> @@ -598,9 +598,8 @@ void inet_csk_reqsk_queue_prune(struct sock *parent,
> &expire, &resend);
> req->rsk_ops->syn_ack_timeout(parent, req);
> if (!expire &&
> - (!resend ||
> - !req->rsk_ops->rtx_syn_ack(parent, req, NULL) ||
> - inet_rsk(req)->acked)) {
> + (!resend || inet_rsk(req)->acked ||
> + !req->rsk_ops->rtx_syn_ack(parent, req, NULL))) {
> unsigned long timeo;
>
> if (req->retrans++ == 0)
Thanks Vijay !
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-26 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-26 8:05 [PATCH net-next V2 1/1] tcp: Prevent needless syn-ack rexmt during TWHS Vijay Subramanian
2012-10-26 8:03 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2012-10-26 21:30 ` Julian Anastasov
2012-10-26 21:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-26 22:52 ` Julian Anastasov
2012-10-27 0:07 ` Vijay Subramanian
2012-10-27 8:43 ` Julian Anastasov
2012-10-27 8:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-27 11:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-27 13:23 ` Julian Anastasov
2012-10-27 13:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-27 14:18 ` [PATCH net-next] tcp: better retrans tracking for defer-accept Eric Dumazet
2012-10-27 18:27 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-10-27 22:29 ` Julian Anastasov
2012-10-28 9:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-28 16:51 ` Julian Anastasov
2012-10-28 20:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-29 9:21 ` Julian Anastasov
2012-11-03 18:46 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1351238609.6537.285.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=enh@google.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=subramanian.vijay@gmail.com \
--cc=venkat.x.venkatsubra@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox