public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
	Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@unimore.it>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net_sched: more precise pkt_len computation
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 13:11:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1351249914.6537.339.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1351243970.6537.321.camel@edumazet-glaptop>

On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 11:32 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> 
> One long standing problem with TSO/GSO/GRO packets is that skb->len
> doesnt represent a precise amount of bytes on wire.
> 
> Headers are only accounted for the first segment.
> For TCP, thats typically 66 bytes per 1448 bytes segment missing,
> an error of 4.5 %
> 
> As consequences :
> 
> 1) TBF/CBQ/HTB/NETEM/... can send more bytes than the assigned limits.
> 2) Device stats are slightly under estimated as well.
> 
> Fix this by taking account of headers in qdisc_skb_cb(skb)->pkt_len
> computation.
> 
> Packet schedulers should use pkt_len instead of skb->len for their
> bandwidth limitations, and TSO enabled devices drivers could use pkt_len
> if their statistics are not hardware assisted, and if they dont scratch
> skb->cb[] first word.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
> Cc: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@unimore.it>
> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
> Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
> ---
>  net/core/dev.c |   11 ++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index b4978e2..cf2b5f4 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -2442,7 +2442,6 @@ static inline int __dev_xmit_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc *q,
>  	bool contended;
>  	int rc;
>  
> -	qdisc_skb_cb(skb)->pkt_len = skb->len;
>  	qdisc_calculate_pkt_len(skb, q);
>  	/*
>  	 * Heuristic to force contended enqueues to serialize on a
> @@ -2579,6 +2578,16 @@ int dev_queue_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb)
>  	skb->tc_verd = SET_TC_AT(skb->tc_verd, AT_EGRESS);
>  #endif
>  	trace_net_dev_queue(skb);
> +	qdisc_skb_cb(skb)->pkt_len = skb->len;
> +	if (skb_is_gso(skb)) {
> +		unsigned int hdr_len = skb_transport_offset(skb);
> +
> +		if (skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type & (SKB_GSO_TCPV4 | SKB_GSO_TCPV6))
> +			hdr_len += tcp_hdrlen(skb);
> +		else
> +			hdr_len += sizeof(struct udphdr);
> +		qdisc_skb_cb(skb)->pkt_len += (skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_segs - 1) * hdr_len;
> +	}
>  	if (q->enqueue) {
>  		rc = __dev_xmit_skb(skb, q, dev, txq);
>  		goto out;
> 

Hmm, this doesnt quite work for GRO (ingress), as we call
skb_reset_transport_header(skb); in __netif_receive_skb() before
handle_ing()

So skb_transport_offset(skb) is 14 here, instead of 14+(IP header)

This skb_reset_transport_header(skb); looks like defensive programming,
for the !NET_SKBUFF_DATA_USES_OFFSET case ?

We could either :

1) remove this skb_reset_transport_header(skb) call

or

2) use the following helper instead :

#ifdef NET_SKBUFF_DATA_USES_OFFSET
static inline void skb_sanitize_transport_header(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
	skb->transport_header = max_t(sk_buff_data_t,
				      skb->data - skb->head,
				      skb->transport_header);
}
#else
static inline void skb_sanitize_transport_header(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
	skb->transport_header = max_t(sk_buff_data_t,
				      skb->data,
				      skb->transport_header);
}
#endif

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-26 11:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-23  4:15 [RFC PATCH net-next] qfq: handle the case that front slot is empty Cong Wang
2012-10-23  7:09 ` Paolo Valente
2012-10-23  8:53   ` Cong Wang
2012-10-26  7:51     ` Paolo Valente
2012-10-26  8:10       ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-26  9:32         ` [PATCH net-next] net_sched: more precise pkt_len computation Eric Dumazet
2012-10-26 11:11           ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2013-01-10 22:36           ` [PATCH v2 " Eric Dumazet
2013-01-10 22:58             ` David Miller
2012-10-26 16:51     ` [RFC PATCH net-next] qfq: handle the case that front slot is empty Paolo Valente
2012-10-28 12:45       ` Cong Wang
2012-10-28 16:07         ` Paolo Valente

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1351249914.6537.339.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paolo.valente@unimore.it \
    --cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox