From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/16] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:16:26 -0400 Message-ID: <1351646186.4004.41.camel@gandalf.local.home> References: <1351622772-16400-1-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com> <20121030214257.GB2681@htj.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: snitzer-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, neilb-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org, fweisbec-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, Trond.Myklebust-HgOvQuBEEgTQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, bfields-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org, paul.gortmaker-CWA4WttNNZF54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org, dm-devel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, agk-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, aarcange-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, rds-devel-N0ozoZBvEnrZJqsBc5GL+g@public.gmane.org, eric.dumazet-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, venkat.x.venkatsubra-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, ccaulfie-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org, dev-yBygre7rU0TnMu66kgdUjQ@public.gmane.org, ericvh-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, josh-iaAMLnmF4UmaiuxdJuQwMA@public.gmane.org, lw-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org, mathieu.desnoyers-vg+e7yoeK/dWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org, axboe-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org, linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, edumazet-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, ejt-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org, Tejun Heo , teigland-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org, torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org, davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org To: Sasha Levin Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dev-bounces-yBygre7rU0TnMu66kgdUjQ@public.gmane.org Errors-To: dev-bounces-yBygre7rU0TnMu66kgdUjQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 20:33 -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Just some nitpicks. > > > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 02:45:57PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > >> +/* Use hash_32 when possible to allow for fast 32bit hashing in 64bit kernels. */ > >> +#define hash_min(val, bits) \ > >> +({ \ > >> + sizeof(val) <= 4 ? \ > >> + hash_32(val, bits) : \ > >> + hash_long(val, bits); \ > >> +}) > > > > Doesn't the above fit in 80 column. Why is it broken into multiple > > lines? Also, you probably want () around at least @val. In general, > > it's a good idea to add () around any macro argument to avoid nasty > > surprises. > > It was broken to multiple lines because it looks nicer that way (IMO). > > If we wrap it with () it's going to go over 80, so it's going to stay > broken down either way :) ({ \ sizeof(val) <= 4 ? hash_32(val, bits) : hash_long(val, bits); \ }) Is the better way to go. We are C programmers, we like to see the ?: on a single line if possible. The way you have it, looks like three statements run consecutively. -- Steve