From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: ling.ma.program@gmail.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] [INET]: Get cirtical word in first 64bit of cache line
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 22:44:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1353912241.30446.1257.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1353900555-5966-1-git-send-email-ling.ma.program@gmail.com>
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 11:29 +0800, ling.ma.program@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Ma Ling <ling.ma.program@gmail.com>
>
> In order to reduce memory latency when last level cache miss occurs,
> modern CPUs i.e. x86 and arm introduced Critical Word First(CWF) or
> Early Restart(ER) to get data ASAP. For CWF if critical word is first member
> in cache line, memory feed CPU with critical word, then fill others
> data in cache line one by one, otherwise after critical word it must
> cost more cycle to fill the remaining cache line. For Early First CPU will
> restart until critical word in cache line reaches.
>
> Hash value is critical word, so in this patch we place it as first member
> in cache line(sock address is cache-line aligned), and it is also good for
> Early Restart platform as well .
>
> Thanks
> Ling
networking patches should be sent to netdev.
(I understand this patch is more a generic one, but at least CC netdev)
You give no performance numbers for this change...
I never heard of this CWF/ER, where are the official Intel documents
about this, and what models really benefit from it ?
Also, why not moving skc_net as well ?
BTW, skc_daddr & skc_rcv_saddr are 'critical' as well, we use them in
INET_MATCH()
It seems we have a 32bit hole on 64bit arches, so we probably should
move inet_dport/inet_num in it. It could well remove a full cache line
miss (I'll send a patch for this after tests)
Thanks
next parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-26 6:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1353900555-5966-1-git-send-email-ling.ma.program@gmail.com>
2012-11-26 6:44 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2012-11-26 20:40 ` [PATCH RFC] [INET]: Get cirtical word in first 64bit of cache line Ben Hutchings
2012-11-27 13:48 ` Ling Ma
2012-11-27 13:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-12-02 13:25 ` Ling Ma
2012-12-02 17:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-02-02 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 net-next] inet: Get critical " Eric Dumazet
2013-02-03 21:00 ` saeed bishara
2013-02-03 21:08 ` David Miller
2013-02-04 0:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-02-04 0:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-02-04 2:53 ` Ling Ma
2013-02-04 3:11 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1353912241.30446.1257.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=ling.ma.program@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox