From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>, Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next PATCH V1 0/9] net: fragmentation performance scalability on NUMA/SMP systems
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:42:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1353940930.11754.221.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1353859891.30446.634.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
On Sun, 2012-11-25 at 08:11 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-11-25 at 09:53 +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>
> > Yes, for the default large 64k packets size, its just a "fake"
> > benchmark. And notice with my fixes, we are even faster than the
> > none-frag/single-UDP packet case... but its because we are getting a
> > GSO/GRO effect.
>
> Could you elaborate on this GSO/GRO effect ?
On the big system, I saw none-frag UDP (1472 bytes) throughput of:
7356.57 + 7351.78 + 7330.60 + 7269.26 = 29308.21 Mbit/s
While with UDP fragments size 65507 bytes I saw:
9228.75 + 9207.81 + 9615.83 + 9615.87 = 37668.26 Mbit/s
Fragmented UDP is faster by:
37668.26 - 29308.21 = 8360.05 Mbit/s
The 65507 bytes UDP size is just a benchmark test, and have no real-life
relevance. As performance starts to drop (below none-frag/normal case)
when the frag size is decreased, to more realistic sizes...
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Sr. Network Kernel Developer at Red Hat
Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-26 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-23 13:08 [RFC net-next PATCH V1 0/9] net: fragmentation performance scalability on NUMA/SMP systems Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2012-11-23 13:08 ` [RFC net-next PATCH V1 2/9] net: frag cache line adjust inet_frag_queue.net Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2012-11-23 13:08 ` [RFC net-next PATCH V1 4/9] net: frag helper functions for mem limit tracking Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2012-11-23 13:08 ` [RFC net-next PATCH V1 7/9] net: frag queue locking per hash bucket Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2012-11-27 9:07 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2012-11-27 15:00 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2012-11-23 13:08 ` [RFC net-next PATCH V1 8/9] net: increase frag queue hash size and cache-line Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2012-11-23 13:08 ` [RFC net-next PATCH V1 9/9] net: frag remove readers-writer lock (hack) Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2012-11-26 6:03 ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-11-26 9:18 ` Florian Westphal
[not found] ` <20121123130806.18764.41854.stgit@dragon>
2012-11-23 19:58 ` [RFC net-next PATCH V1 1/9] net: frag evictor, avoid killing warm frag queues Florian Westphal
2012-11-24 11:36 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2012-11-25 2:31 ` [RFC net-next PATCH V1 0/9] net: fragmentation performance scalability on NUMA/SMP systems Eric Dumazet
2012-11-25 8:53 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2012-11-25 16:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-11-26 14:42 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2012-11-26 15:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-11-26 15:29 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
[not found] ` <20121123130826.18764.66507.stgit@dragon>
2012-11-26 2:54 ` [RFC net-next PATCH V1 5/9] net: frag per CPU mem limit and LRU list accounting Cong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1353940930.11754.221.camel@localhost \
--to=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).