From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Frank Blaschka <blaschka@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: performance regression on HiperSockets depending on MTU size
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 08:12:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1353946351.30446.1779.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121126153242.GA61652@tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 16:32 +0100, Frank Blaschka wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> since kernel 3.6 we see a massive performance regression on s390
> HiperSockets devices.
>
> HiperSockets differ from normal devices by the fact they support
> large MTU sizes (up to 56K). Here are some iperf numbers to show
> the problem depended on MTU size:
>
> # ifconfig hsi0 mtu 1500
> # iperf -c 10.42.49.2
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Client connecting to 10.42.49.2, TCP port 5001
> TCP window size: 47.6 KByte (default)
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> [ 3] local 10.42.49.1 port 55855 connected with 10.42.49.2 port 5001
> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
> [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 632 MBytes 530 Mbits/sec
>
> # ifconfig hsi0 mtu 9000
> # iperf -c 10.42.49.2
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Client connecting to 10.42.49.2, TCP port 5001
> TCP window size: 97.0 KByte (default)
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> [ 3] local 10.42.49.1 port 55856 connected with 10.42.49.2 port 5001
> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
> [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 2.26 GBytes 1.94 Gbits/sec
>
> # ifconfig hsi0 mtu 32000
> # iperf -c 10.42.49.2
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Client connecting to 10.42.49.2, TCP port 5001
> TCP window size: 322 KByte (default)
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> [ 3] local 10.42.49.1 port 55857 connected with 10.42.49.2 port 5001
> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
> [ 3] 0.0-10.3 sec 3.12 MBytes 2.53 Mbits/sec
>
> Prior the regression throughput grows with the MTU size but now it drops
> to a few Mbits if the MTU is bigger then 15000. It is interesting to see
> if 2 or more connections are running in parallel the regression is gone.
>
> # ifconfig hsi0 mtu 32000
> # iperf -c 10.42.49.2 -P2
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Client connecting to 10.42.49.2, TCP port 5001
> TCP window size: 322 KByte (default)
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> [ 4] local 10.42.49.1 port 55869 connected with 10.42.49.2 port 5001
> [ 3] local 10.42.49.1 port 55868 connected with 10.42.49.2 port 5001
> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
> [ 4] 0.0-10.0 sec 2.19 GBytes 1.88 Gbits/sec
> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
> [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 2.17 GBytes 1.87 Gbits/sec
> [SUM] 0.0-10.0 sec 4.36 GBytes 3.75 Gbits/sec
>
> I bisected the problem to following patch:
>
> commit 46d3ceabd8d98ed0ad10f20c595ca784e34786c5
> Author: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed Jul 11 05:50:31 2012 +0000
>
> tcp: TCP Small Queues
>
> This introduce TSQ (TCP Small Queues)
>
> TSQ goal is to reduce number of TCP packets in xmit queues (qdisc &
> device queues), to reduce RTT and cwnd bias, part of the bufferbloat
> problem.
>
> Changing sysctl net.ipv4.tcp_limit_output_bytes to a higher value
> (e.g. 640000) seems to fix the problem.
>
> How does MTU influence/effects TSQ?
> Why is the problem gone if there are more connections?
> Do you see any drawbacks by increasing net.ipv4.tcp_limit_output_bytes?
> Finally is this expected behavior or is there a bug depending on the big
> MTU? What can I do to check ... ?
>
Hi Frank, thanks for this report.
You could tweak tcp_limit_output_bytes, but IMO the root of the problem
is in the driver itself.
For example, I had to change mlx4 driver for the same problem : Make
sure a TX packet can be "TX completed" in a short amount of time.
In the case of mlx4, the wait time was 128 us, but I suspect on your
case its more like an infinite time or several ms.
The driver is delaying the free of TX skb by a fixed amount of time,
or relies on following transmits to perform the TX completion
Check for an example :
commit ecfd2ce1a9d5e6376ff5c00b366345160abdbbb7
Author: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Date: Mon Nov 5 16:20:42 2012 +0000
mlx4: change TX coalescing defaults
mlx4 currently uses a too high tx coalescing setting, deferring
TX completion interrupts by up to 128 us.
With the recent skb_orphan() removal in commit 8112ec3b872,
performance of a single TCP flow is capped to ~4 Gbps, unless
we increase tcp_limit_output_bytes.
I suggest using 16 us instead of 128 us, allowing a finer control.
Performance of a single TCP flow is restored to previous levels,
while keeping TCP small queues fully enabled with default sysctl.
This patch is also a BQL prereq.
Reported-by: Vimalkumar <j.vimal@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-26 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-26 15:32 performance regression on HiperSockets depending on MTU size Frank Blaschka
2012-11-26 16:12 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2012-11-27 6:21 ` Cong Wang
2012-11-27 6:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-11-28 5:31 ` Cong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1353946351.30446.1779.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=blaschka@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox