netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
	Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>, Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next PATCH V1 7/9] net: frag queue locking per hash bucket
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 10:07:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1354007260.11754.246.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121123130836.18764.9297.stgit@dragon>

On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 14:08 +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> DO NOT apply - patch not finished, can cause on OOPS/PANIC during hash rebuild

Think I have fixed this issue.  And its even fixed in this patch, as the
oops occurred, when testing, with a slightly older version of this
patch.


> This patch implements per hash bucket locking for the frag queue
> hash.  This removes two write locks, and the only remaining write
> lock is for protecting hash rebuild.  This essentially reduce the
> readers-writer lock to a rebuild lock.

[... cut ...]
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c b/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c
> index 1620a21..447423f 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c
[...]
> @@ -102,9 +112,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(inet_frags_exit_net);
>  
>  static inline void fq_unlink(struct inet_frag_queue *fq, struct inet_frags *f)
>  {
> -	write_lock(&f->lock);
> +	struct inet_frag_bucket *hb;
> +	unsigned int hash;
> +
> +	read_lock(&f->lock);
> +	hash = f->hashfn(fq);
> +	hb = &f->hash[hash];

Before the read_lock, were _here_ below then hash calc.  Which is wrong,
and caused the oops, as the hash result can change, when rnd is changed,
during hash rebuild.

> +
> +	spin_lock_bh(&hb->chain_lock);
>  	hlist_del(&fq->list);
> -	write_unlock(&f->lock);
> +	spin_unlock_bh(&hb->chain_lock);
> +	read_unlock(&f->lock);
>  	inet_frag_lru_del(fq);
>  }

[... cut ...]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-27  9:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-23 13:08 [RFC net-next PATCH V1 0/9] net: fragmentation performance scalability on NUMA/SMP systems Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2012-11-23 13:08 ` [RFC net-next PATCH V1 2/9] net: frag cache line adjust inet_frag_queue.net Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2012-11-23 13:08 ` [RFC net-next PATCH V1 4/9] net: frag helper functions for mem limit tracking Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2012-11-23 13:08 ` [RFC net-next PATCH V1 7/9] net: frag queue locking per hash bucket Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2012-11-27  9:07   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2012-11-27 15:00   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2012-11-23 13:08 ` [RFC net-next PATCH V1 8/9] net: increase frag queue hash size and cache-line Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2012-11-23 13:08 ` [RFC net-next PATCH V1 9/9] net: frag remove readers-writer lock (hack) Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2012-11-26  6:03   ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-11-26  9:18   ` Florian Westphal
     [not found] ` <20121123130806.18764.41854.stgit@dragon>
2012-11-23 19:58   ` [RFC net-next PATCH V1 1/9] net: frag evictor, avoid killing warm frag queues Florian Westphal
2012-11-24 11:36     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2012-11-25  2:31 ` [RFC net-next PATCH V1 0/9] net: fragmentation performance scalability on NUMA/SMP systems Eric Dumazet
2012-11-25  8:53   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2012-11-25 16:11     ` Eric Dumazet
2012-11-26 14:42       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2012-11-26 15:15         ` Eric Dumazet
2012-11-26 15:29           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
     [not found] ` <20121123130826.18764.66507.stgit@dragon>
2012-11-26  2:54   ` [RFC net-next PATCH V1 5/9] net: frag per CPU mem limit and LRU list accounting Cong Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1354007260.11754.246.camel@localhost \
    --to=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=amwang@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).