From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cong Wang Subject: Re: [Patch net-next] xfrm: add missing xfrm message types to selinux perm table Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 14:56:25 +0800 Message-ID: <1354690585.28951.10.camel@cr0> References: <1354599571-6181-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> <20121204.130257.1178992077066719400.davem@davemloft.net> <20121205054152.GO22290@secunet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au To: Steffen Klassert Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:10785 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753046Ab2LEG5H (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Dec 2012 01:57:07 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20121205054152.GO22290@secunet.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 06:41 +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote: > On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 01:02:57PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > > From: Cong Wang > > Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 13:39:31 +0800 > > > > > Cc: Steffen Klassert > > > Cc: Herbert Xu > > > Cc: "David S. Miller" > > > Signed-off-by: Cong Wang > > > > Steffen will you take this into your IPSEC tree? > > > > I would do so, but I have not seen this patch by now. > Was it really send to me? I have not even seen it on the > netdev list. > > Anyway, I don't have it, please resend. > Weird, you are already Cc'ed in the original patch, Cc: Steffen Klassert .