From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: Add trace events for all receive exit points
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 15:46:53 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <1354786248.4048.1542055613213.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
References: <20181112194405.4133-1-gbastien@versatic.net> <879033794.3997.1542053367213.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <2134979231.4006.1542054055701.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <20181112154035.56de5e23@vmware.local.home>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Genevi=C3=A8ve?= Bastien <gbastien@versatic.net>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
To: rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.efficios.com ([167.114.142.138]:36580 "EHLO
        mail.efficios.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1725861AbeKMGlt (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 13 Nov 2018 01:41:49 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20181112154035.56de5e23@vmware.local.home>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

----- On Nov 12, 2018, at 3:40 PM, rostedt rostedt@goodmis.org wrote:

> On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 15:20:55 -0500 (EST)
> Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Hrm, looking at this again, I notice that there is a single DEFINE_EVENT
>> using net_dev_template_simple.
>> 
>> We could simply turn netif_receive_skb_list_exit into a TRACE_EVENT(),
>> remove the net_dev_template_simple, and rename the net_dev_template_return
>> to net_dev_template ?
> 
> This too is only cosmetic and doesn't affect the code at all, because a
> TRACE_EVENT() is really just:
> 
> #define TRACE_EVENT(name, proto, args, tstruct, assign, print) \
>	DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(name,			       \
>			     PARAMS(proto),		       \
>			     PARAMS(args),		       \
>			     PARAMS(tstruct),		       \
>			     PARAMS(assign),		       \
>			     PARAMS(print));		       \
>	DEFINE_EVENT(name, name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args));
> 
> -- Steve
> 

Of course.

I also notice that in two cases, a "gro_result_t" is implicitly cast
to "int". I usually frown upon this kind of stuff, because it's asking
for trouble if gro_result_t typedef to something else than "int" in the
future.

I would recommend going for two templates, one which takes a "int"
ret parameter, and the other a "gro_result_t" ret parameter.

Or am I being too cautious ?

Thanks,

Mathieu


>> 
>> It's pretty clear from the prototype that it expects a "ret" argument,
>> so I don't see the need to also state it in the template name.
>> 

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com