From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Howells Subject: Re: Getting the new RxRPC patches upstream Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 09:32:56 +0100 Message-ID: <1355.1177317176@redhat.com> References: <20070420212835.GA863@tv-sign.ru> <20070420.015838.83621529.davem@davemloft.net> <29341.1176975158@redhat.com> <2969.1176992303@redhat.com> <1101.1177056127@redhat.com> <4713.1177065706@redhat.com> <20070420113805.c4877dc8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton , David Miller , ebiederm@xmission.com, containers@lists.osdl.org, hch@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Oleg Nesterov Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:48552 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753917AbXDWIdb (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Apr 2007 04:33:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070420212835.GA863@tv-sign.ru> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org > We only care when del_timer() returns true. In that case, if the timer > function still runs (possible for single-threaded wqs), it has already > passed __queue_work(). Why do you assume that? David