From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/netfront: improve truesize tracking Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 08:17:49 -0800 Message-ID: <1355933869.21834.13.camel@edumazet-glaptop> References: <1355838711-5473-1-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com> <1355843525.9380.18.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1355844398.14620.254.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <55633610.20121219123427@eikelenboom.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ian Campbell , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , annie li , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" To: Sander Eikelenboom Return-path: Received: from mail-da0-f41.google.com ([209.85.210.41]:41921 "EHLO mail-da0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755021Ab2LSQRw (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Dec 2012 11:17:52 -0500 Received: by mail-da0-f41.google.com with SMTP id e20so1009882dak.28 for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 08:17:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <55633610.20121219123427@eikelenboom.it> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 12:34 +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: > Hi Ian, > > It ran overnight and i haven't seen the warn_once trigger. > (but i also didn't with the previous patch) > As I said, the miminum value to not trigger the warning was what Ian patch was doing, but it was still a not accurate estimation. Doing the real accounting might trigger slow transferts, or dropped packets because of socket limits (SNDBUF / RCVBUF) being hit sooner. So the real question was : If accounting for full pages, is your applications run as smooth as before, with no huge performance regression ?