From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tcp: split tcp_ecn sysctl knob to distinguish between IPv4 and IPv6 Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 04:47:40 -0800 Message-ID: <1357217260.21409.24224.camel@edumazet-glaptop> References: <20130103000009.GG4464@order.stressinduktion.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Hannes Frederic Sowa Return-path: Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:57240 "EHLO mail-pb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751237Ab3ACMrm (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jan 2013 07:47:42 -0500 Received: by mail-pb0-f46.google.com with SMTP id wy7so8509236pbc.33 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 04:47:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20130103000009.GG4464@order.stressinduktion.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 01:00 +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > ECN could be more reliable when used with IPv6 (I don't have proofs). For > people who want to try ECN with IPv6 but still have problems connecting > to destinations because of broken IPv4 routers this switch allows one > to enable ECN just for IPv6. > > Perhaps ECN could be enabled by default in future. > > No code changes since initial submission, just added documentation. > > Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa > --- It would be nice to make the ecn sysctl per net namespace. Do you have an idea of how to adapt your patch to get this as well ?