public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 net-next] softirq: reduce latencies
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 23:49:40 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1357285780.21409.28416.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1357252816.21409.26384.camel@edumazet-glaptop>

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>

In various network workloads, __do_softirq() latencies can be up
to 20 ms if HZ=1000, and 200 ms if HZ=100.

This is because we iterate 10 times in the softirq dispatcher,
and some actions can consume a lot of cycles.

This patch changes the fallback to ksoftirqd condition to :

- A time limit of 2 ms.
- need_resched() being set on current task

When one of this condition is met, we wakeup ksoftirqd for further
softirq processing if we still have pending softirqs.

Using need_resched() as the only condition can trigger RCU stalls,
as we can keep BH disabled for too long.

I ran several benchmarks and got no significant difference in
throughput, but a very significant reduction of latencies (one order
of magnitude) :

In following bench, 200 antagonist "netperf -t TCP_RR" are started in
background, using all available cpus.

Then we start one "netperf -t TCP_RR", bound to the cpu handling the NIC
IRQ (hard+soft)

Before patch :

# netperf -H 7.7.7.84 -t TCP_RR -T2,2 -- -k
RT_LATENCY,MIN_LATENCY,MAX_LATENCY,P50_LATENCY,P90_LATENCY,P99_LATENCY,MEAN_LATENCY,STDDEV_LATENCY
MIGRATED TCP REQUEST/RESPONSE TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET
to 7.7.7.84 () port 0 AF_INET : first burst 0 : cpu bind
RT_LATENCY=550110.424
MIN_LATENCY=146858
MAX_LATENCY=997109
P50_LATENCY=305000
P90_LATENCY=550000
P99_LATENCY=710000
MEAN_LATENCY=376989.12
STDDEV_LATENCY=184046.92

After patch :

# netperf -H 7.7.7.84 -t TCP_RR -T2,2 -- -k
RT_LATENCY,MIN_LATENCY,MAX_LATENCY,P50_LATENCY,P90_LATENCY,P99_LATENCY,MEAN_LATENCY,STDDEV_LATENCY
MIGRATED TCP REQUEST/RESPONSE TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET
to 7.7.7.84 () port 0 AF_INET : first burst 0 : cpu bind
RT_LATENCY=40545.492
MIN_LATENCY=9834
MAX_LATENCY=78366
P50_LATENCY=33583
P90_LATENCY=59000
P99_LATENCY=69000
MEAN_LATENCY=38364.67
STDDEV_LATENCY=12865.26

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
---
v2: min(1, (2*HZ/1000)) -> max(1, (2*HZ/1000)), as spotted by Ben

 kernel/softirq.c |   17 +++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index ed567ba..8d5e4be 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -195,21 +195,21 @@ void local_bh_enable_ip(unsigned long ip)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(local_bh_enable_ip);
 
 /*
- * We restart softirq processing MAX_SOFTIRQ_RESTART times,
- * and we fall back to softirqd after that.
+ * We restart softirq processing for at most 2 ms,
+ * and if need_resched() is not set.
  *
- * This number has been established via experimentation.
+ * These limits have been established via experimentation.
  * The two things to balance is latency against fairness -
  * we want to handle softirqs as soon as possible, but they
  * should not be able to lock up the box.
  */
-#define MAX_SOFTIRQ_RESTART 10
+#define MAX_SOFTIRQ_TIME  max(1, (2*HZ/1000))
 
 asmlinkage void __do_softirq(void)
 {
 	struct softirq_action *h;
 	__u32 pending;
-	int max_restart = MAX_SOFTIRQ_RESTART;
+	unsigned long end = jiffies + MAX_SOFTIRQ_TIME;
 	int cpu;
 	unsigned long old_flags = current->flags;
 
@@ -264,11 +264,12 @@ restart:
 	local_irq_disable();
 
 	pending = local_softirq_pending();
-	if (pending && --max_restart)
-		goto restart;
+	if (pending) {
+		if (time_before(jiffies, end) && !need_resched())
+			goto restart;
 
-	if (pending)
 		wakeup_softirqd();
+	}
 
 	lockdep_softirq_exit();
 

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-04  7:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-03 12:28 [PATCH net-next] softirq: reduce latencies Eric Dumazet
2013-01-03 20:46 ` Andrew Morton
2013-01-03 22:41   ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-04  5:16     ` Namhyung Kim
2013-01-04  6:53       ` Eric Dumazet
     [not found]     ` <787701357283699@web24e.yandex.ru>
2013-01-04  7:46       ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-03 22:08 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-01-03 22:40   ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-04  7:49     ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2013-01-04  8:15       ` [PATCH v2 " Joe Perches
2013-01-04  8:23         ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-04  9:12           ` Joe Perches
2013-01-04 17:00             ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-04 21:15               ` [PATCH] jiffies conversions: Use compile time constants when possible Joe Perches
2013-01-04 21:49       ` [PATCH v2 net-next] softirq: reduce latencies David Miller
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-01-05  8:58 Sedat Dilek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1357285780.21409.28416.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=therbert@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox