From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Mark Zealey <netdev@markandruth.co.uk>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: UDP multi-core performance on a single socket and SO_REUSEPORT
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 11:37:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1357328238.1678.2189.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50E72493.4050406@markandruth.co.uk>
On Fri, 2013-01-04 at 18:50 +0000, Mark Zealey wrote:
> I have written two small test scripts now which can be found at
> http://mark.zealey.org/uploads/ - one launches 16 listening threads for
> a single UDP socket, the other needs to be run as
>
> for i in `seq 16`; do ./udp_test_client & done
>
> On my test server (32-core), stock kernel 3.7.1, 90% of the time is
> spent in the kernel waiting on spinlocks. Perf output:
Mark
We know the scalability issue of using a single socket and many threads.
The send path was somehow fixed to not require socket lock.
But the receive path uses a single receive_queue, protected by a
spinlock.
SO_REUSEPORT would be nice, but had known issues.
af_packet fanout implementation was nicer.
You could try :
1) Use af_packet FANOUT instead of UDP sockets
2) rewrite SO_REUSEPORT to use a FANOUT like implementation
3) Extend UDP sockets to be able to use a configurable number of receive
queues instead of a single one.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-04 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-28 10:01 UDP multi-core performance on a single socket and SO_REUSEPORT Mark Zealey
2013-01-04 18:50 ` Mark Zealey
2013-01-04 19:37 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2013-01-04 20:47 ` Tom Herbert
2013-01-04 21:46 ` Mark Zealey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1357328238.1678.2189.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@markandruth.co.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox