From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Major network performance regression in 3.7
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 06:59:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1357484342.6919.61.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130106092435.GZ16031@1wt.eu>
On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 10:24 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> It does not change anything to the tests above unfortunately. It did not
> even stabilize the unstable runs.
>
> I'll check if I can spot the original commit which caused the regression
> for MTUs that are not n*4096+52.
Since you don't post your program, I wont be able to help, just by
guessing what it does...
TCP has very low defaults concerning initial window, and it appears you
set RCVBUF to even smaller values.
Here we can see "win 8030", this is not a sane value...
18:32:08.071602 IP 127.0.0.1.26792 > 127.0.0.1.8000: S 2036886615:2036886615(0) win 8030 <mss 65495,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 9>
18:32:08.071605 IP 127.0.0.1.8000 > 127.0.0.1.26792: S 126397113:126397113(0) ack 2036886616 win 8030 <mss 65495,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 9>
So you apparently changed /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_rmem or SO_RCVBUF ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-06 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-05 21:49 Major network performance regression in 3.7 Willy Tarreau
2013-01-05 23:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-05 23:29 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-01-06 0:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-06 0:50 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-01-06 1:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-06 1:30 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-01-06 1:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-06 1:51 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-06 2:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-06 2:18 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-01-06 2:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-06 2:32 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-01-06 2:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-06 2:52 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-01-06 7:31 ` [PATCH net-next] net: splice: avoid high order page splitting Eric Dumazet
2013-01-07 5:07 ` David Miller
2013-01-06 7:35 ` Major network performance regression in 3.7 Eric Dumazet
2013-01-06 9:24 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-01-06 10:25 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-01-06 11:46 ` Romain Francoise
2013-01-06 11:53 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-01-06 12:01 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-01-06 14:59 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2013-01-06 15:51 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-01-06 16:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-06 16:44 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-01-06 17:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-06 17:35 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-01-06 18:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-06 18:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-06 18:51 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-06 19:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-06 19:34 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-01-06 19:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-06 19:53 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-01-07 4:21 ` [PATCH] tcp: fix MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST logic Eric Dumazet
2013-01-07 4:59 ` David Miller
2013-01-06 21:49 ` Major network performance regression in 3.7 John Stoffel
2013-01-06 21:52 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-01-06 21:55 ` John Stoffel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1357484342.6919.61.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox