From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cong Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/3] netpoll: add IPv6 support Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 11:55:51 +0800 Message-ID: <1357617351.3544.8.camel@cr0> References: <1357543036-15492-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> <20130107.194621.1068055780988116658.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:22519 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750785Ab3AHDz5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2013 22:55:57 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20130107.194621.1068055780988116658.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 19:46 -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Cong Wang > Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 15:17:13 +0800 > > > v4: remove ndisc_parse_options(), ignore ICMP options there > > make udp6_csum_init() inline so that we don't rely on IPV6=y > > fix a conflict with Jiri's patchset > > Where did I say to inline this function? > > I said to put it into a seperate static library that gets > linked into the kernel statically, regardless of whether > IPV6 is 'm' or 'y'. > > I've said this _3_ times and I'm really starting to get > frustrated with the fact that you can't seem to read what > I write. > > What part of the "obj-y +=" rules in net/ipv6/Makefile > are you unable to see? I knew. Our goal is to make it work for IPV6=m, so why inline is not a solution while putting it into a static library is? udp6_csum_init() is not a big function, so I see no reason why it can't be inlined. And AFAIK, udp6_csum_init() can't fit into any of these obj-y files in net/ipv6/. Am I still missing anything? Thanks.