From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Christian Becker <c.becker@traviangames.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Subject: Re: tainted warnings with tcp splicing in 3.7.1
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 22:59:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1357801149.27446.1142.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1357751372.27446.40.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 09:09 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> My feeling is that tcp_recv_skb() should eat skbs instead of only
> finding the right one
>
Thats indeed the case.
> Thats because skb_splice_bits() releases the socket lock before calling
> splice_to_pipe()
>
> Once socket is released, other incoming TCP frames can be processed, and
> the skb we are actually processing might be 'collapsed' into smaller
> units.
>
> Christian, if I send you patches, are you OK to test them ?
>
>
Here is the patch fixing this issue.
Thanks a lot for your report, this is a very very old bug.
GRO being more deployed, and with TCP coalescing as well, chances to
trigger this bug increased a lot.
To reproduce it, I had to force MSS=400 and stress the receiver,
adding extra delays in skb_splice_bits() with socket lock being not
held.
[PATCH] tcp: fix splice() and tcp collapsing interaction
Under unusual circumstances, TCP collapse can split a big GRO TCP packet
while its being used in a splice(socket->pipe) operation.
skb_splice_bits() releases the socket lock before calling
splice_to_pipe().
[ 1081.353685] WARNING: at net/ipv4/tcp.c:1330 tcp_cleanup_rbuf+0x4d/0xfc()
[ 1081.371956] Hardware name: System x3690 X5 -[7148Z68]-
[ 1081.391820] cleanup rbuf bug: copied AD3BCF1 seq AD370AF rcvnxt AD3CF13
To fix this problem, we must eat skbs in tcp_recv_skb().
Remove the inline keyword from tcp_recv_skb() definition since
it has three call sites.
Reported-by: Christian Becker <c.becker@traviangames.com>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
---
net/ipv4/tcp.c | 13 ++++++++++---
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index 1ca2536..1f901be 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -1428,12 +1428,12 @@ static void tcp_service_net_dma(struct sock *sk, bool wait)
}
#endif
-static inline struct sk_buff *tcp_recv_skb(struct sock *sk, u32 seq, u32 *off)
+static struct sk_buff *tcp_recv_skb(struct sock *sk, u32 seq, u32 *off)
{
struct sk_buff *skb;
u32 offset;
- skb_queue_walk(&sk->sk_receive_queue, skb) {
+ while ((skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue)) != NULL) {
offset = seq - TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq;
if (tcp_hdr(skb)->syn)
offset--;
@@ -1441,6 +1441,11 @@ static inline struct sk_buff *tcp_recv_skb(struct sock *sk, u32 seq, u32 *off)
*off = offset;
return skb;
}
+ /* This looks weird, but this can happen if TCP collapsing
+ * splitted a fat GRO packet, while we released socket lock
+ * in skb_splice_bits()
+ */
+ sk_eat_skb(sk, skb, false);
}
return NULL;
}
@@ -1520,8 +1525,10 @@ int tcp_read_sock(struct sock *sk, read_descriptor_t *desc,
tcp_rcv_space_adjust(sk);
/* Clean up data we have read: This will do ACK frames. */
- if (copied > 0)
+ if (copied > 0) {
+ tcp_recv_skb(sk, seq, &offset);
tcp_cleanup_rbuf(sk, copied);
+ }
return copied;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_read_sock);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-10 6:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-09 13:01 tainted warnings with tcp splicing in 3.7.1 Christian Becker
2013-01-09 14:50 ` Lukas Tribus
2013-01-09 17:01 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-09 17:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-10 6:59 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2013-01-10 7:21 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-01-10 15:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-10 16:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-10 18:22 ` Rick Jones
2013-01-10 18:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-10 18:49 ` Rick Jones
2013-01-10 19:43 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-01-12 0:46 ` [PATCH net-next] net: splice: fix __splice_segment() Eric Dumazet
2013-01-12 0:48 ` David Miller
2013-01-10 18:27 ` tainted warnings with tcp splicing in 3.7.1 Lukas Tribus
2013-01-10 18:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-10 22:39 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1357801149.27446.1142.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=c.becker@traviangames.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox