From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 09/10] bnx2x: Added FW GRO bridging support Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:44:35 -0800 Message-ID: <1358189075.8744.3320.camel@edumazet-glaptop> References: <1358176310-31504-1-git-send-email-yuvalmin@broadcom.com> <1358176310-31504-10-git-send-email-yuvalmin@broadcom.com> <1358184123.8744.3127.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, eilong@broadcom.com, ariele@broadcom.com To: Yuval Mintz Return-path: Received: from mail-pb0-f52.google.com ([209.85.160.52]:52755 "EHLO mail-pb0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755896Ab3ANSoi (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2013 13:44:38 -0500 Received: by mail-pb0-f52.google.com with SMTP id ro2so2301552pbb.11 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:44:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1358184123.8744.3127.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2013-01-14 at 09:22 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote: > This looks weird to me. This should be called by GRO stack only. > > What is the value of gso_segs ? > > The reason I am pointing this out is the recent change in commit 1def9238d4aa2146924994aa4b7dc861f03b9362 (net_sched: more precise pkt_len computation) bnx2x not setting gso_segs means that qdisc accounting on ingress is completely wrong.