From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] Avoid making inappropriate requests of NETIF_F_V[46]_CSUM devices
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 00:03:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1358381029.2397.93.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130116.180044.630688719598008373.davem@davemloft.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 995 bytes --]
On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 18:00 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> I'm saying that tun can't inject unchecked crap into our stack.
That's a very strange way of putting it.
Our stack has explicit support for sane hardware devices with
NETIF_F_HW_CSUM capability that can checksum anything.
And it has checks (harmonize_features) on output, so that if the device
on which a packet is being emitted *doesn't* have appropriate hardware
checksum capability, we'll do the checksum in software.
Except that the check in harmonize_features() doesn't do that check
*properly*. It only catches *some* of the packets that the device can't
handle, and lets others through.
So we basically can't use NETIF_F_HW_CSUM in the general case, for
anything like SCTP or any other protocol, because harmonize_features()
is buggy and will let it go out a device that can't handle it.
Um, SCTP *does* use CHECKSUM_PARTIAL. Am I missing something or does
that suffer the same problem?
--
dwmw2
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 6171 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-17 0:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-14 12:10 [RFC PATCH 1/3] Avoid making inappropriate requests of NETIF_F_V[46]_CSUM devices David Woodhouse
2013-01-14 12:12 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] Prepare to allow for hardware checksum of ICMPv6 David Woodhouse
2013-01-14 12:15 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] Use hardware checksum for UDPv6 and ICMPv6 David Woodhouse
2013-01-16 20:54 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] Avoid making inappropriate requests of NETIF_F_V[46]_CSUM devices David Miller
2013-01-16 22:34 ` David Woodhouse
2013-01-16 23:00 ` David Miller
2013-01-17 0:03 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2013-01-29 16:35 ` David Woodhouse
2015-09-21 16:29 ` David Woodhouse
2015-09-23 15:42 ` David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1358381029.2397.93.camel@shinybook.infradead.org \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).