From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cong Wang Subject: Re: Redefinition of struct in6_addr in and Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:40:46 +0800 Message-ID: <1358394046.3855.10.camel@cr0> References: <201301161205.04502.vapier@gentoo.org> <201301161228.42592.vapier@gentoo.org> <20130116.135959.90676245194307972.davem@davemloft.net> <201301161422.19202.vapier@gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , bhutchings@solarflare.com, libc-alpha@sourceware.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, tmb@mageia.org, eblake@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, libvirt-list@redhat.com, tgraf@suug.ch, schwab@suse.de, carlos@systemhalted.org To: Mike Frysinger Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201301161422.19202.vapier@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 14:22 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > but this is still too vague. what headers/definitions do people want to see > simultaneously included ? changes would be needed on both sides (kernel & C > library). > Hi, Mike, Please take a look at my first email in this thread. The user application includes and . uses struct_in6 but doesn't include (this is my bad, sorry), an obvious fix is just including . But this immediately breaks applications which include and , just as what Thomas reported. And if_bridge.h is kernel-specific, there is no corresponding glibc one, so you can't blame applications which include both of them. Thanks.