From: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Eric Dumazet <erdnetdev@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH V7 2/3] virtio-net: split out clean affinity function
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:36:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1359102981-3401-2-git-send-email-gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1359102981-3401-1-git-send-email-gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Split out the clean affinity function to virtnet_clean_affinity().
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <erdnetdev@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
---
V6->V7:
always set vq_index (Jason)
V5->V6: NEW
drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index 0f3afa8..2f6fe9b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -1016,46 +1016,55 @@ static int virtnet_vlan_rx_kill_vid(struct net_device *dev, u16 vid)
return 0;
}
-static void virtnet_set_affinity(struct virtnet_info *vi, bool set)
+static void virtnet_clean_affinity(struct virtnet_info *vi, long hcpu)
{
int i;
int cpu;
- /* In multiqueue mode, when the number of cpu is equal to the number of
- * queue pairs, we let the queue pairs to be private to one cpu by
- * setting the affinity hint to eliminate the contention.
- */
- if ((vi->curr_queue_pairs == 1 ||
- vi->max_queue_pairs != num_online_cpus()) && set) {
- if (vi->affinity_hint_set)
- set = false;
- else
- return;
- }
-
- if (set) {
- i = 0;
- for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
- virtqueue_set_affinity(vi->rq[i].vq, cpu);
- virtqueue_set_affinity(vi->sq[i].vq, cpu);
- *per_cpu_ptr(vi->vq_index, cpu) = i;
- i++;
- }
-
- vi->affinity_hint_set = true;
- } else {
- for(i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
+ if (vi->affinity_hint_set) {
+ for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
virtqueue_set_affinity(vi->rq[i].vq, -1);
virtqueue_set_affinity(vi->sq[i].vq, -1);
}
- i = 0;
- for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
+ vi->affinity_hint_set = false;
+ }
+
+ i = 0;
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+ if (cpu == hcpu) {
+ *per_cpu_ptr(vi->vq_index, cpu) = -1;
+ } else {
*per_cpu_ptr(vi->vq_index, cpu) =
++i % vi->curr_queue_pairs;
+ }
+ }
+}
- vi->affinity_hint_set = false;
+static void virtnet_set_affinity(struct virtnet_info *vi)
+{
+ int i;
+ int cpu;
+
+ /* In multiqueue mode, when the number of cpu is equal to the number of
+ * queue pairs, we let the queue pairs to be private to one cpu by
+ * setting the affinity hint to eliminate the contention.
+ */
+ if (vi->curr_queue_pairs == 1 ||
+ vi->max_queue_pairs != num_online_cpus()) {
+ virtnet_clean_affinity(vi, -1);
+ return;
}
+
+ i = 0;
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+ virtqueue_set_affinity(vi->rq[i].vq, cpu);
+ virtqueue_set_affinity(vi->sq[i].vq, cpu);
+ *per_cpu_ptr(vi->vq_index, cpu) = i;
+ i++;
+ }
+
+ vi->affinity_hint_set = true;
}
static void virtnet_get_ringparam(struct net_device *dev,
@@ -1105,7 +1114,7 @@ static int virtnet_set_channels(struct net_device *dev,
netif_set_real_num_tx_queues(dev, queue_pairs);
netif_set_real_num_rx_queues(dev, queue_pairs);
- virtnet_set_affinity(vi, true);
+ virtnet_set_affinity(vi);
}
put_online_cpus();
@@ -1274,7 +1283,7 @@ static void virtnet_del_vqs(struct virtnet_info *vi)
{
struct virtio_device *vdev = vi->vdev;
- virtnet_set_affinity(vi, false);
+ virtnet_clean_affinity(vi, -1);
vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev);
@@ -1398,7 +1407,7 @@ static int init_vqs(struct virtnet_info *vi)
goto err_free;
get_online_cpus();
- virtnet_set_affinity(vi, true);
+ virtnet_set_affinity(vi);
put_online_cpus();
return 0;
--
1.8.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-25 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-25 8:36 [PATCH V7 1/3] virtio-net: fix the set affinity bug when CPU IDs are not consecutive Wanlong Gao
2013-01-25 8:36 ` Wanlong Gao [this message]
2013-01-25 8:36 ` [PATCH V7 3/3] virtio-net: reset virtqueue affinity when doing cpu hotplug Wanlong Gao
2013-01-25 9:00 ` [PATCH V7 1/3] virtio-net: fix the set affinity bug when CPU IDs are not consecutive Jason Wang
2013-01-25 9:05 ` Wanlong Gao
2013-01-25 9:11 ` Jason Wang
2013-01-25 9:16 ` Wanlong Gao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1359102981-3401-2-git-send-email-gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=erdnetdev@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).