[Patch net-next] ipv6: fix a RCU warning in net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c

[Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>]

This patch fixes the following RCU warning:

[   51.680236] ===============================
[   51.681914] [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
[   51.683610] 3.8.0-rc6-next-20130206-sasha-00028-g83214f7-dirty #276 Tainted: G        W
[   51.686703] -------------------------------
[   51.688281] net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c:671 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!

we should use rcu_dereference_bh() when we hold rcu_read_lock_bh().

Reported-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>

---
diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c
index ea42bf4..a7da2f4 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c
@@ -65,13 +65,13 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(ip6_fl_lock);
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(ip6_sk_fl_lock);
 
 #define for_each_fl_rcu(hash, fl)				\
-	for (fl = rcu_dereference(fl_ht[(hash)]);		\
+	for (fl = rcu_dereference_bh(fl_ht[(hash)]);		\
 	     fl != NULL;					\
-	     fl = rcu_dereference(fl->next))
+	     fl = rcu_dereference_bh(fl->next))
 #define for_each_fl_continue_rcu(fl)				\
-	for (fl = rcu_dereference(fl->next);			\
+	for (fl = rcu_dereference_bh(fl->next);			\
 	     fl != NULL;					\
-	     fl = rcu_dereference(fl->next))
+	     fl = rcu_dereference_bh(fl->next))
 
 #define for_each_sk_fl_rcu(np, sfl)				\
 	for (sfl = rcu_dereference_bh(np->ipv6_fl_list);	\