From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter@vger.kernel.org,
coreteam@netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] netfilter: nfnetlink: silence warning if CONFIG_PROVE_RCU isn't set
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 13:45:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1362401141.16460.24.camel@x61.thuisdomein> (raw)
Since commit c14b78e7decd0d1d5add6a4604feb8609fe920a9 ("netfilter:
nfnetlink: add mutex per subsystem") building nefnetlink.o without
CONFIG_PROVE_RCU set, triggers this GCC warning:
net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:65:22: warning: ‘nfnl_get_lock’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
The cause of that warning is, in short, that rcu_lockdep_assert()
compiles away if CONFIG_PROVE_RCU is not set. Silence this warning by
open coding nfnl_get_lock() in the sole place it was called, which
allows to remove that function.
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
---
0) Compile tested only, but without CONFIG_PROVE_RCU set! This patch
needs building and running by someone who actually uses that option.
1) This patch triggers a checkpatch "line over 80 characters" warning.
But note that it actually shortens the line checkpatch complains about
(by one character!).
net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c | 7 +------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c
index d578ec2..0b1b32c 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c
@@ -62,11 +62,6 @@ void nfnl_unlock(__u8 subsys_id)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nfnl_unlock);
-static struct mutex *nfnl_get_lock(__u8 subsys_id)
-{
- return &table[subsys_id].mutex;
-}
-
int nfnetlink_subsys_register(const struct nfnetlink_subsystem *n)
{
nfnl_lock(n->subsys_id);
@@ -199,7 +194,7 @@ replay:
rcu_read_unlock();
nfnl_lock(subsys_id);
if (rcu_dereference_protected(table[subsys_id].subsys,
- lockdep_is_held(nfnl_get_lock(subsys_id))) != ss ||
+ lockdep_is_held(&table[subsys_id].mutex)) != ss ||
nfnetlink_find_client(type, ss) != nc)
err = -EAGAIN;
else if (nc->call)
--
1.7.11.7
next reply other threads:[~2013-03-04 12:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-04 12:45 Paul Bolle [this message]
2013-03-04 15:59 ` [PATCH] netfilter: nfnetlink: silence warning if CONFIG_PROVE_RCU isn't set Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1362401141.16460.24.camel@x61.thuisdomein \
--to=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox