From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mathias Krause Subject: [PATCH 3/3] dcbnl: fix various netlink info leaks Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2013 16:52:21 +0100 Message-ID: <1362844341-12591-4-git-send-email-minipli@googlemail.com> References: <1362844341-12591-1-git-send-email-minipli@googlemail.com> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Mathias Krause To: "David S. Miller" Return-path: Received: from mail-bk0-f44.google.com ([209.85.214.44]:42624 "EHLO mail-bk0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932429Ab3CIPwq (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Mar 2013 10:52:46 -0500 Received: by mail-bk0-f44.google.com with SMTP id j4so1146301bkw.31 for ; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 07:52:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1362844341-12591-1-git-send-email-minipli@googlemail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: The dcb netlink interface leaks stack memory in various places: * perm_addr[] buffer is only filled at max with 12 of the 32 bytes but copied completely, * no in-kernel driver fills all fields of an IEEE 802.1Qaz subcommand, so we're leaking up to 58 bytes for ieee_ets structs, up to 136 bytes for ieee_pfc structs, etc., * the same is true for CEE -- no in-kernel driver fills the whole struct, Prevent all of the above stack info leaks by properly initializing the buffers/structures involved. Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause --- net/dcb/dcbnl.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/dcb/dcbnl.c b/net/dcb/dcbnl.c index 1b588e2..21291f1 100644 --- a/net/dcb/dcbnl.c +++ b/net/dcb/dcbnl.c @@ -284,6 +284,7 @@ static int dcbnl_getperm_hwaddr(struct net_device *netdev, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, if (!netdev->dcbnl_ops->getpermhwaddr) return -EOPNOTSUPP; + memset(perm_addr, 0, sizeof(perm_addr)); netdev->dcbnl_ops->getpermhwaddr(netdev, perm_addr); return nla_put(skb, DCB_ATTR_PERM_HWADDR, sizeof(perm_addr), perm_addr); @@ -1042,6 +1043,7 @@ static int dcbnl_ieee_fill(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *netdev) if (ops->ieee_getets) { struct ieee_ets ets; + memset(&ets, 0, sizeof(ets)); err = ops->ieee_getets(netdev, &ets); if (!err && nla_put(skb, DCB_ATTR_IEEE_ETS, sizeof(ets), &ets)) @@ -1050,6 +1052,7 @@ static int dcbnl_ieee_fill(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *netdev) if (ops->ieee_getmaxrate) { struct ieee_maxrate maxrate; + memset(&maxrate, 0, sizeof(maxrate)); err = ops->ieee_getmaxrate(netdev, &maxrate); if (!err) { err = nla_put(skb, DCB_ATTR_IEEE_MAXRATE, @@ -1061,6 +1064,7 @@ static int dcbnl_ieee_fill(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *netdev) if (ops->ieee_getpfc) { struct ieee_pfc pfc; + memset(&pfc, 0, sizeof(pfc)); err = ops->ieee_getpfc(netdev, &pfc); if (!err && nla_put(skb, DCB_ATTR_IEEE_PFC, sizeof(pfc), &pfc)) @@ -1094,6 +1098,7 @@ static int dcbnl_ieee_fill(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *netdev) /* get peer info if available */ if (ops->ieee_peer_getets) { struct ieee_ets ets; + memset(&ets, 0, sizeof(ets)); err = ops->ieee_peer_getets(netdev, &ets); if (!err && nla_put(skb, DCB_ATTR_IEEE_PEER_ETS, sizeof(ets), &ets)) @@ -1102,6 +1107,7 @@ static int dcbnl_ieee_fill(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *netdev) if (ops->ieee_peer_getpfc) { struct ieee_pfc pfc; + memset(&pfc, 0, sizeof(pfc)); err = ops->ieee_peer_getpfc(netdev, &pfc); if (!err && nla_put(skb, DCB_ATTR_IEEE_PEER_PFC, sizeof(pfc), &pfc)) @@ -1280,6 +1286,7 @@ static int dcbnl_cee_fill(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *netdev) /* peer info if available */ if (ops->cee_peer_getpg) { struct cee_pg pg; + memset(&pg, 0, sizeof(pg)); err = ops->cee_peer_getpg(netdev, &pg); if (!err && nla_put(skb, DCB_ATTR_CEE_PEER_PG, sizeof(pg), &pg)) @@ -1288,6 +1295,7 @@ static int dcbnl_cee_fill(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *netdev) if (ops->cee_peer_getpfc) { struct cee_pfc pfc; + memset(&pfc, 0, sizeof(pfc)); err = ops->cee_peer_getpfc(netdev, &pfc); if (!err && nla_put(skb, DCB_ATTR_CEE_PEER_PFC, sizeof(pfc), &pfc)) -- 1.7.10.4